UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS
rem52504_at_aol.com
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Big Bang is Wrong Links"
- Previous message: David Nelson: "Big Bang is Wrong Links"
- Next in thread: Dave: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Michael Varney: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Rick Russell: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Chuck Szmanda: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Kevin G. Rhoads: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: hanson: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Cardinal Chunder: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Maybe reply: lanny budd: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Karl Johanson: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Jun 2004 13:27:14 -0700
>
UN-CHARGED ELECTRONS
It is PRETTY OBVIOUS, from observation and experiment,
that static electricity BEHAVES MUCH DIFFERENTLY than current
electricity. The real reason for this, according to the
comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe
developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson, is that
static electrons are charged, while most electrons flowing
through a wire at low or moderate voltage are UN-CHARGED.
Static electrons VIGOROUSLY REPEL each other. If
current electrons flowing through a wire behaved like that,
then they would all REPEL each other toward the OUTSIDE of
the wire and flow ONLY along its OUTER SURFACE. This would
make the conductance of a wire proportional to its
CIRCUMFERENCE. But the conductance is in fact proportional
to CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA, indicating that current electrons
flow throughout the ENTIRE VOLUME of the wire. "Skin effect"
shows up ONLY with radio-frequency alternating current, and
for reasons related to the inductance of the wire (induced
back-emf at the center of the wire) rather than from any
charges. "Skin effect" is essentially ZERO at 0 frequency
(DC).
The solution to the mystery of the vacuum tube is that
electrons on the cathode are GIVEN a charge by the hot
filament, and then most of them GIVE UP their charge when
striking the plate, thereby heating it up, the charge being
converted back to heat. (The "law" of conservation of charge
is ERRONEOUS. Electric charges can be EASILY created or
destroyed.)
UN-charged electrons are MASS-LESS.
Voltage is really a PRESSURE on electrons, which occupy
space in a wire, and resist compression, like water molecules
in a pipe.
A WEALTH of Information about the comprehensive GENERAL
UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late
Physicist Dewey B. Larson can be found at the web site
http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm or /dbl/index.htm.
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
P.S.: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS stranger than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
>
>
>
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Big Bang is Wrong Links"
- Previous message: David Nelson: "Big Bang is Wrong Links"
- Next in thread: Dave: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Michael Varney: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Rick Russell: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Chuck Szmanda: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Kevin G. Rhoads: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: hanson: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Cardinal Chunder: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Maybe reply: lanny budd: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Reply: Karl Johanson: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|