Re: = c + v (train)
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Where's my spam"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: = c + v (train)"
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: = c + v (train)"
- Reply: kenseto: "Re: = c + v (train)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 21:16:20 GMT
kenseto wrote:
>
> <sigh> SR is incomplete. It asserts reciprocity between
> relative frames where there is none. For example: The SR
> effect on the GPS clock is 7 us/day running slow compared
> to the ground clock.
> IRT is a complete theory of motion. It includes SR and GR as subsets.
> IRT posits that there is no reciprocity between relative frames.
>
> Please show your calculations and e-mail me a copy.
>
Hey Seto... go to bed tonight repeating, "no data from any
experiment or observation has ever falsified Special Relativity".
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Where's my spam"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: UN- CHARGED ELECTRONS"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: = c + v (train)"
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: = c + v (train)"
- Reply: kenseto: "Re: = c + v (train)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
