Re: Quantum Entanglement and FTL information transfer

From: Bill Hobba (bhobba_at_rubbish.net.au)
Date: 06/04/04 

Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 04:05:14 GMT

"Greysky" <greyskynospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1LRvc.5070$ux4.4770@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message
> news:SJPvc.4791$rz4.1387@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >
> > "Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
> > news:slrncbv0ku.5c.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
> > > Greysky:
> > >
> > > [*shoveloads snipped*]
> > >
> > > >Strangely enough, this is exactly the conclusion others, such as
> Hawking
> > > >and Feynman, have reached. Feynman's sum over histories approach
> > requires
> > > >the use of imaginary time to allow quantum decoherence ... which is
> > > >getting back to what I have been saying concerning the nature of
> quantum
> > > >processes.
> > >
> > > Stop trying piece together your own personal theory from random
> > > soundbytes you don't understand. If you think you understand
> > > what you just said, show me explicitly how a wick rotation allows
> > > quantum decoherence.
> >
> > Bilge you hit the nail right on the head when you said 'Stop trying
piece
> > together your own personal theory from random soundbytes you don't
> > understand' I doubt he even knows what wick rotation is, contour
> > integration or even analytic continuation.
> >
>
> Ahh...it's so nice to see the sockpuppet on the left hand talking to the
> sockpuppet on the right hand.
>

So nice to see you prove our opinion correct by avoiding Bilges challenge.

Bill

Relevant Pages
Quantcast