Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax
From: Kevin S. Wilson (rescyou_at_spro.net)
Date: 06/05/04
- Next message: Robert Clark: "Metallic hydrogen [Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 687 June 4, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein]"
- Previous message: edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- In reply to: bob: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- Next in thread: bob: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- Reply: bob: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 14:41:00 -0600
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 19:22:39 GMT, bob <thanatos@coldmail.nu> wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:44:50 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson <rescyou@spro.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 11:25:42 -0700, edens morgan mair fheal greykitten
>>tomys des anges <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>as everybody should know
>>>the dark ages got their name from the atmospheric soot and lengthened winters
>>>after the comet collision in central asia
>>>
>>>chronicled in the tale of eight dragons
>>>(the comet had broken up into eight pieces before impact)
>>>the collision in ad 218 signaled the demise of the han dynasty a few years later
>>>with the chaos in china
>>>first from the floods of melted glaciers
>>>and then subsequently with famine due to crop failures
>>>
>>>the poor conditions on the asian steppes
>>>forced the huns to migrate westward putting pressure on the germans and romans
>>>together with crop failures in north africa and north europe
>>>this led to the collapse of the western roman empire two hundred years later
>>
>>Did the Enlightenment begin when people once again started using
>>capital letters and punctuation?
>
>I just googled you and I wasn't surprised to find this in the 7th post
>listed:
>
>"[THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE IS INTENDED TO BE DERISIVE AND INSULTING. IT
>MOCKS YOUR SUB-STANDARD WRITING SKILLS AND CALLS INTO QUESTION YOUR
>ABILITY TO FUNCTION IN A TEXT-ONLY MEDIUM, AS WELL AS YOUR
>INTELLIGENCE, YOUR SOCIAL SKILLS, YOUR QUESTIONABLE GROOMING AND
>HYGIENE, AND YOUR TASTE IN FOOTWEAR.]"
Would you have been surprised if it had been the 6th post instead?
>I had to go puke when I read this in the tenth post listed:
No, you had to go puke because you've been binge-drinking and posting
to Usenet since last Wednesday. Do you remember where you parked your
car?
>"Snopes also fails to mention the fact that I am a hot, sexy
>stud-muffin. QED."
Was there anything your stalk^H^H^H^H^H research turned up that
might've given you a clue as to how to interpret that post and the
others? F'rinstance, did you happen to notice where it was posted, and
in response to what?
There's a concept you might want to acquaint yourself with. We in the
profession call it a Joke.
>There was no need for me to research the self centered whackboi who
>calls himself Kevin S. Wilson.
Right. As if I would use my real name on the USENET (tm).
-- Kevin S. Wilson Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho "Who put these fingerprints on my imagination?"
- Next message: Robert Clark: "Metallic hydrogen [Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 687 June 4, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein]"
- Previous message: edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- In reply to: bob: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- Next in thread: bob: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- Reply: bob: "Re: Interesting Thought Re: How to write a pseudo scientifical hoax"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
