Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: Shrikantha S. Shastry: "Re: Big Bang Busted in Science Classes for High Schools"
- Previous message: ZZBunker: "Re: Fusion"
- In reply to: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Next in thread: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Reply: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:30:54 -0000
David Rutherford:
>
>
>Bilge wrote:
>> David Rutherford:
>> >Bilge wrote:
>> >> You just wrote a paragraph that means nothing.
>> >
>> >What I wrote is a simple _fact_ that applies to any metric and its
>>
>> Suit yourself. I'm not going to follow a maze of twisty little passages,
>> all alike.
>
>You seem to have a lack of knowledge of basic relativistic physics.
>Don't blame that on me. Pick up a book.
You asked me to give you an example of what what wrong with your
so-called theory. I did. You think a metric with a signature of
(++++) describes this universe. You pick up a book.
- Next message: Shrikantha S. Shastry: "Re: Big Bang Busted in Science Classes for High Schools"
- Previous message: ZZBunker: "Re: Fusion"
- In reply to: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Next in thread: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Reply: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|