Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv

From: Joe Cosby (http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl)
Date: 06/07/04 

Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 08:02:15 -0700

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:30:55 GMT, "George Hammond"
<research137@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> >> You find, for instance "30 1st order factors", then you search around
>> >> through the endless annals of religion and find something else there
>> >> are 30 of, and say "There, it's explained!".
>> >>
>> >> That isn't an "explanation". That's an "it reminds me of".
>> >
>> >[Hammond]
>> >Horse***..... when Bohr quantized thes orbitals
>> >in a solar model of the atom it gave the right
>> >energy levels for an atom.. therefore we
>> >say "the Bohr model is correct".
>>
>> So you are arguing that since you have found thirty of one thing and
>> thirty of another thing, the one models the other.
>
>[Hammond]
>No... you''re just too fcukin lazy to read the theory.
>The number of thifngs explained is COMPREHENSIVE
>AND COMPLETE. You just don't know about it because
>you haven't actually READ the theory.
>
>>
>> Tell me then, under what circumstances would it be possible to find
>> thirty of one thing and thirty of another thing and -not- be able to
>> say "the one thing is a model of the other"?
>
>[Hammond]
>It isn't "30", Kooky, its more like 300 things.

You aren't making sense.

You have claimed that the corelation between numbers which you cited
earlier is what proves your theory.

I am challenging the meaningfulness of that corelation, and you are
babbling in response. 

-- 
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.com/ 
How about if as a Xorn, you absorb first an Amulet of Extra Ring? If you
have a 1 in 3 of gaining the intrinsic by X-eating the ", then presumably,
the extra slots could open up.
Quantcast