Re: A variable rest mass interpretation of general relativity

From: Michael Varney (varney_at_colorado_no_spam.edu)
Date: 06/10/04 

Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 23:30:29 -0600

"John Heighway" <jeheighway@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:BQNxc.8303$uX2.5711@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "davidoff404" <davidoff404_AT_@_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ca2e8d$fg5$1@kermit.esat.net...
> > Michael Varney wrote:
> > > "John Heighway" <jeheighway@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > > news:at0xc.5490$uX2.1736@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > >
> > >>I invite those interested to read my paper, "Toward a Deeper
> Understanding
> > >>of General Relativity"
> > >
> > >
> > > It is unmitigated garbage. How on earth did you get an academic
sponsor
> to
> > > post it for you?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Note that the original date, as given by the catalogue number, is
> > January 2000, during the dark days when anyone could get a paper up and
> > long before the ArXiv came up with the idea of endorsement.
>
> I assume from the rapidity of your responses that neither of you made the
> effort to actually read my paper.

Why waste time reading unmitigated garbage from a crackpot?

> The paper has been read and reviewed
> several times by referees of leading journals.

And rejected most likly.

> Although it has never been
> accepted for publication

Thought so.

> , the reason for rejection has never been on account
> of errors of fact or logic.

Then never got that far... the placed in the circular folder at first
glance.

<SNIP pontification masterbation>

> I would appreciate from you any substantive criticism of fact or logic
that
> you can offer

That assumes that I respect both you or your paper enough to take the time.
I don't.

>, or, failing that, a clear statement as to what prejudices led
> you to post your unfavorable assessment of my work.

It is garbage, and you are a crackpot. How much more clear do you need?

> Regards, Jack Heighway

Hit the road... Jack.
>
>