Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv
From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 06/12/04
- Next message: Kris Olhovsky: "Re: Article: Greatest maths problem 'solved'"
- Previous message: Leonard Pardin: "Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??"
- In reply to: Beable van Polasm: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:45:50 -0400
Beable van Polasm wrote:
>>>[Hammond]
>>>Unsupported assertion.
>>
>>Wow. We may have a new David Tholen here, chaps!
>
>
> What about this?
>
>
>>>On top of that, he personally is a dead ringer for Steven Segal,
>>>which is a strong recommendation in and of itself.
>
>
> Surely he CAN'T be SERIOUS! I suggest somebody asks Steven Segal what
> he thinks about Hammond's SPOG Theory.
Sadly - he's serious. That, and that the jutz is question looks Nothing
like Steven Segal, might be a clue.
Aikido dojo -> Riemann's theory of curved manifolds -> R_(ab) = 8 pi {
T_(ab) - 1/2 g_(ab) T }.
Thus, the Ricci curvature is directly coupled to the immediate presence
of matter at a given event, but only (apparently) if Steven Segal is
present.
Hmmmmm
- Next message: Kris Olhovsky: "Re: Article: Greatest maths problem 'solved'"
- Previous message: Leonard Pardin: "Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??"
- In reply to: Beable van Polasm: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]