Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter.
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: Coreleus Corneleus: "Re: Eye Input Signal Testbed"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: SPOG IS FUBAR"
- In reply to: Alan: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Next in thread: ZenIsWhen: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Reply: ZenIsWhen: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:32:34 GMT
"Alan" <gper@mindless.com> wrote in message
news:847702a8.0406121659.28fee046@posting.google.com...
> > If all human minds died tomorrow morning,
> > how would you "know, demonstrate, or prove"
> > that the Universe still existed tomorrow night.
> > Just answer the question please.
>
>
> If I sealed something in a box, I couldn't "prove" it was still there
> without opening the box. So? I have no reason to doubt that it is
> still there.
[Hammond]
WRONG. You have reason to believe it is there
because you put it there. And you "know it".
However, if you (and everybody else) were
DEAD..... no one would know it... therefore
it would no longer exist... because it COULDN'T
BE CONFIRMED either by report, testimony
or experiment.
>
> If I were dead, obviously I couldn't prove anything. Again - so? I
> have no reason to doubt that the universe would still exist, even if
> ALL life were to end. The early universe apparently existed, and
> certainly contained no HUMAN life, and NO life that we know of. Why
> WOULD it cease to exist if all men died tomorrow?
[Hammond]
BECAUSE "the statment: 'the universe existed 15B years ago' "
ONLY HAS AN OPERATIONAL MEANING within
the context of "human reality".... If "human reality" did not
exist... then the statement HAS NO MEANING.
ok.... "human reality" is only 40K years old (was created
for the first time 40K yrs ago).... therefore the statment
"the Universe is 15B years old" HAS NO MEANING BEFORE
38,000 B.C.
> You've written of absolute and perceived reality. Okay, if we're all
> gone, POOF! to perceived reality, but how and why would that affect
> absolute reality?
[Hammond]
We have no idea what "absolute reality" is.... we DEFINE
"absolute reality" to be "identical" to "perceived reality".
THAT IS NOT A PROBLEM as long as "perceived reality"
is a "1:1 map" of "absolute reality". HOWEVER, modern science
(Hammond 2003) has discovered that the map is NOT
1:1... in fact (on average) its more like 0.8:1.... and this
fact explains the supernatural effect we call "GOD".
Taht is what this discovery and all this discussion is
about!
BTW.. congratulations.. you seem to be closing in on
a comprehension of what this discovery says.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================
- Next message: Coreleus Corneleus: "Re: Eye Input Signal Testbed"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: SPOG IS FUBAR"
- In reply to: Alan: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Next in thread: ZenIsWhen: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Reply: ZenIsWhen: "Re: A Letter to George Hammond, and all Christians for that matter."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
