Re: Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: Coreleus Corneleus: "Re: Eye Input Signal Testbed"
- Previous message: Coreleus Corneleus: "Re: Eye Input Signal Testbed"
- In reply to: mountain man: "Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether"
- Next in thread: mountain man: "Re: Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether"
- Reply: mountain man: "Re: Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:18:44 GMT
"mountain man" <hobbit@southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message news:%O_yc.19525$sj4.5755@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Anisotropy is not detected in vacuum interferometers.
> Big deal. 10^-15?
Next year you will write:
"Anisotropy is not detected in vacuum interferometers.
Big deal. 10^-17?"
In 5 years you will write:
"Anisotropy is not detected in vacuum interferometers.
Big deal. 10^-19?"
In 10 years your son will write:
"Anisotropy is not detected in vacuum interferometers.
Big deal. 10^-21?"
Big deal.
Who cares.
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Coreleus Corneleus: "Re: Eye Input Signal Testbed"
- Previous message: Coreleus Corneleus: "Re: Eye Input Signal Testbed"
- In reply to: mountain man: "Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether"
- Next in thread: mountain man: "Re: Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether"
- Reply: mountain man: "Re: Maurice Allais 2004 Notes on anisotropy of the aether"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]