Re: Factoring paper is wrong
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 06/14/04
- Next message: Michael Varney: "Re: Alternative Perspectives"
- Previous message: Michael Varney: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- In reply to: MorituriMax: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:27:50 -0400
MorituriMax wrote:
> If he were really honest he would have had several people proof read his paper
> before he posted it.
That's more a matter of maturity and wisdom than honesty.
Even acknowledged top-flight mathematicians have been
known to make errors. Peer review is an attempt to
catch ones that can readily be spotted by colleagues
(among other functions), and it seems to work fairly
well for that, but it doesn't catch them all. The most
famous example is probably Kempe's proof of the four-
color theorem.
- Next message: Michael Varney: "Re: Alternative Perspectives"
- Previous message: Michael Varney: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- In reply to: MorituriMax: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Reply: James Harris: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Factoring paper is wrong"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|