Re: geek shamanic clue
From: David Dalton (dalton_at_nfld.com)
Date: 06/14/04
- Next message: Martin Hardcastle: "Re: How Good Is Cambridge Part III Mathematical Tripos?"
- Previous message: David Dalton: "Re: geek shamanic clue"
- In reply to: David Dalton: "geek shamanic clue"
- Next in thread: David Dalton: "Re: geek shamanic clue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:06:43 -0230
David Dalton wrote:
> On afterthought, perhaps the k in question must be
> that in the diffusion equation, not necessarily
> for heat and in time,
I meant the first order partial derivative is not
necessarily in time, and the Laplacian operator perhaps
might not be in spatial coordinates, and perhaps
might not be merely three dimensional, but any
advanced reader would have already considered that
but many of them stay just on sci.physics.research .
>which in LaTeX is:
>
> \begin{equation}
> \frac{\partial U}{\partial x}=k\nabla^2 U\,.
> \end{equation}
David
- Next message: Martin Hardcastle: "Re: How Good Is Cambridge Part III Mathematical Tripos?"
- Previous message: David Dalton: "Re: geek shamanic clue"
- In reply to: David Dalton: "geek shamanic clue"
- Next in thread: David Dalton: "Re: geek shamanic clue"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]