Re: expansion of universe 2
From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 06/15/04
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Syncronized atomic clocks"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Grahics drawer wanted to show light source dependency"
- In reply to: daydreamer: "expansion of universe 2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
"daydreamer" <im2dangerus@hotmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote in
message news:40ce213c$1_1@127.0.0.1...
> I have read all the feedback on my idea( as opposed to 'my theory'),
> and would like to thank all those who responded with POSITIVE
> criticism.
>
> However, I didn't explain what I meant clearly. Where I mentioned
the
> word 'exponentially', what I really meant was 'with an inverse
square
> law'
That defines clearly what the state of your education is.
> (thank you bjeorne and Nir for pointing this out). Also, I would
like
> to add that in this 'idea' of mine, the observed gravitational force
> of attraction between bodies,in the obseved universe, is really just
> the resultant force that is manifested when you add up the
> anti-gravitational force of repulsion between the bodies, and the
> 'real' gravitational force of attraction between the bodies. This
> resultant force is attractive at small distances between the
> bodies(since at these distances the 'real' gravitational attraction
> is much greater than the anti-gravitational repulsion), and
repulsive
> at large distances between the bodies(hence the sudden acceleration
> of expansion of the universe approximately 6.3 billion years ago).
> Also, I would like to point out that in my 'idea', this
> anti-gravitational force of repulsion does not change with time -
> only with distance travelled(increases with an inverse square law
> with distance travelled away from the source)
> Does this make my idea more feasible now?
No. It was, and remains, horse manure.
> I'm not really bothered
> because either way, scientists are confident that very soon the
> mystery concerning the origin of this 'dark-energy' will be resolved
> as fresh new data rolls in. I'm sure that all us theorists and
> 'daydreamers' can be happy about that.
Franz
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Syncronized atomic clocks"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Grahics drawer wanted to show light source dependency"
- In reply to: daydreamer: "expansion of universe 2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
