Fusion Barrier Limit extends into biology and solving diseases such as cancer, Alzheimers etc ; future direction of Cancer-- bypass it

From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 06/16/04 

Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 02:07:26 -0500

It is fitting that I should begin such a new theme on a day I am sort of
feeling down mood.

I am reflecting on how difficult it is to get answers on cancer; solve
cancer. Is cancer disease a question of atoms in molecules going one way
or another and thus either cancer or no cancer. I was reflecting on how
difficult it is to solve Alzheimers or Parkinsons.

I was reflecting on the fact that human medical science has not made one
dent into the vast ocean of unknowns about viruses. And the fact that
viruses seem to never be conquered. That the war on viruses seems to
always favor the viruses.

If human bodies were like machines and robots we could analyse diagnose
find what is wrong and fix it. Diseases seldom trace such
straightforwardness to a solution.

Perhaps there are some diseases connected to aging and that they will
never be solved or fixed simply because the body itself must age. So
these protein diseases of Alzheimers, Parkinsons and Prion are just as
much about the aging process as the details of the regions of the brain.

And it seems as though our increase in knowledge of cancer never really
amounts to much. We can take an old car and fix it up so as it runs
almost like new. We cannot do that to animal bodies. Not just a lack of
understanding and knowledge of what is wrong but it seems deeper than
that.

I am wondering on a day like this, whether there are limitations of
science as to ever understanding what happens in diseases like Cancer or
Alzheimers etc.

Sort of like a Uncertainty Principle, only instead of the parameters of
energy and time, the parameters of never knowing what goes wrong in
making a cancer cell. The Uncertainty Principle applies to the
microscopic realm of matter, but cancer cells and Alzheimers have
microscopic realms.

I am the author of the Fusion Barrier Principle which is another
limiting principle which says that no machine can simultaneously control
fusion and exceed breakeven. Either the control is lost or the breakeven
point is lost. In fact the number is 2/3 breakeven is the maximum any
tokamak can reach yet still controlled.

So if the FBP is true, then are the implications such that some diseases
like cancer are never able to be fully understood and simultaneously
cured?

Same question for Alzheimers and Parkinsons and Prion.

The FBP for physics says that our Universe is so constructed that energy
and control of energy cannot co-exist when in a fusion machine reaches
2/3 breakeven. If FBP is true, then, is it ingrained in all of Nature
that it seeps down into biology and says that we can never both
understand cancer and control (cure) cancer? Seems highly farfetched.
Seems like the Uncertainty Principle would say more about whether cancer
can be fully understood or not.

So this leads into the questions of whether it is best for the world to
keep up this pace of cancer and protein disease research. For is not
that research after a narrowminded goal of conquering by fully
understanding and then treating with a cure?

Instead, Aging is perhaps the key ingredient that creates and spurs
these diseases onwards. So to cure cancer or Alzheimers while doing
nothing about aging seems rather narrowminded.

What I am going to propose is for the Medical Community to stop for a
moment and step back from its hot paced research and ask the questions
that perhaps Cancer or Viruses or protein diseases will never be
understood with any degree of confidence and that they will always be
side by side to humanity as nemesis.

It is like saying that if FBP is true then it is fruitless to think that
we can monitor can keep tabs on all atoms involved in the plasma so that
we can surpass 2/3 breakeven.

I propose there is a cure for cancer and Alzheimers and Parkinsons and
Prion and viruses etc etc. It is called BYPASSING. Instead of spending
time, energy, money pouring into medicine, why not bypass these
diseases.

Admit that as we get older and age we are closer to death. Accept death
instead of trying to superficially tinsel apply potions and ointments of
medicine. The cure is ---- cloning. We find out we have cancer of
whatever, then we do not go on these medical programs to fight it. We
submit to death approaching. And if possible we clone ourselves and
leave behind details of our lives to our clonee.

So instead of fighting these diseases when death will overcome us all. I
say do a side-step motion. Do a Bypass motion. Submit to death
approaching and if possible make a clone of yourself and leave as much
details about your life to the clone.

Because it seems to me, theoretically, that to solve Cancer or solve
Alzheimers yet never addressing the fact that these persons are old aged
and how can you solve cancer yet not solve old age, is rather
hypocritical.

I know of no example in history where a major Bypass was executed on a
large problem at hand. I would like to have one for a analogy.

And I hate to see myself with revved brain engine whirrring at high
speed trying to understand Alzheimers or cancer when in the final
analysis they are never to be understood to any degree of completeness
or satisfaction. Millions of scientists and millions of people in
medicine who battle these diseases, I believe all of them are probably
under a delusion that they are 100% understandable and eventually
curable. But perhaps that is a falsehood. And like the viruses, where on
this planet humanity has a better chance of going extinct than the
viruses. And that in all the power of knowledge and understanding of
viruses, we have not been able to control a single virus species. We
tolerate and put up with viruses and we bypass them if possible.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Relevant Pages
Quantcast