Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?
From: sweet (sweet430_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/17/04
- Next message: Richard Herring: "Re: My Sundial & Archaic Units"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Jun 2004 07:37:57 -0700
I am reading Goldstein's mechanics and in the very first chapter he
states that if the work from pt. 1 to pt. 2 is the same for different
paths, then the force is conserved. I know that since delta_P = 0,
then mg is a conservative force. But I was wondering how to do show
that in general using the definition of W(1,2), namely:
Let W(1,2) := the work performed by some force F from point 1 to point
2.
Let W(1,2) := I(1,2) [ F.ds ].
Let I(1,2) := the integral from point 1 to point 2.
Let delta_I(1,2) := I(1,2)_path2 - I(1,2)_path1
And so the statement reduces to showing that delta_I(1,2) = 0. How
then does one prove that the force, F, is conservative? The furthest
one can go is:
I(1,2)[ (F.ds)_path2 - (F.ds)_path1 ] = 0,
since both F and ds are arbitrary. Then again, since F.ds = 0 for
perpendicular components... nah... that's only good for 1 specific
angle.
So perhaps you can see where I am stuck and help me out here.
Thanks in advance for any help you may give me.
-sweet
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/jbc33/
- Next message: Richard Herring: "Re: My Sundial & Archaic Units"
- Previous message: Ian Stirling: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Proof of F is conservative if delta_W = 0?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|