Re: 3g masts
From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 06/17/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Terminal Velocity without drag?"
- Previous message: Richard Herring: "Re: Faraday Cage Grounded Or Ungrounded"
- In reply to: Jim s: "3g masts"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: 3g masts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:54:37 +0100
In message <EAcAc.96140$dP1.314017@newsc.telia.net>, Jim s
<welcome@hotmail.com> writes
>Hi! Here in Sweden the government runs over people and put these mobile
>communication masts here and there.
>
>Some say the radiation is dangerous. Some say not. But the money is with the
>NOT of course.
>
>What is your opinion?
>
The closer you are to a base station, the less power your phone needs to
radiate, and therefore the less energy you receive. Thanks to the
inverse square law, the transmitter in the hand gives a far higher field
strength than the one up the pole.
And when you have to resort to metastudies to get statistical
significance, my money is definitely on NOT.
-- Richard Herring
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Terminal Velocity without drag?"
- Previous message: Richard Herring: "Re: Faraday Cage Grounded Or Ungrounded"
- In reply to: Jim s: "3g masts"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: 3g masts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
