Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive"
From: asps (asps.ra1_at_flashnet.it)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: Other news groups"
- Previous message: luke: "Re: Dipolar coordinates help.."
- In reply to: Laura: "Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive""
- Next in thread: Laura: "Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive""
- Reply: Laura: "Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:42:44 +0200
"Laura" <laura@nospam.me> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:cb76ib$g0r$3@news.cybercity.dk...
>
> <matricola555@yahoo.it> wrote in message
> news:b7eea6dc.0406210016.53b52a31@posting.google.com...
> > www.asps.it/nucleoin.htm
> >
> > we are doing TdS1 thruster more fast
> >
> > www.asps.it/dinpnn.htm
>
> This isn't a warp drive. If you insist on using Star Trek terminology,
maybe
> it's an impulse drive :-)
>
[first excuse my english]
> The warp drive hypothesis calls for space itself to be compressed in front
> of the vessel,
"space compression" has no physical meaning ... we can say only that our pnn
thruster "swim" in the e.m. field
>thus physically shortening the distance that must be traveled
> to get to the destination. Not all of the distance at once, though - just
a
> tiny bit of it, and once the vessel has passed through that, another tiny
> bit, and so on. It could be described as creating a "wave" in space, and
> then surfing that wave. It is purely hypothetical. We have no practical
idea
> of how to provide the enormous amounts of energy required to do something
> like this, and even if we did, we'd have to find a way of warping space
with
> it.
no enormous amount of energy are required becouse pnn thruster doesn't
vilolate momentum and energy conservation ...
when it increase its kinetic energy it decrease its magnetic potential
energy ........ so its e.m. mass decrease as soon as pnn velocity increase
.......
http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep6/ep6-asps.htm
http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep7/ep7-asps.htm
> The beauty of the idea is that the vessel itself wouldn't have to move
> faster than the speed of light;
i don't know what a pnn system might do ..... we make experiments about 450
MHz and 50 Watt ..... we strongly suspect that velocity incerase in a no
linear manner as frequency and energy increase
>the deformation in space could do that
> instead, and the vessel would simply stay within this wave in space.
>Such a
> wave could possibly break the lightspeed barrier, since it is neither
matter
> nor electromagnetic radiation.
as the e.m. mass of a pnn system decrease as soon as pnn velocity increase
we have good perspectives for FTL travels
>Whether it really could, however, remains to
> be seen.
we need to increase energy and frequency of TdS1 thruster to see if FTL
travels might be possible ....
- Next message: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: Other news groups"
- Previous message: luke: "Re: Dipolar coordinates help.."
- In reply to: Laura: "Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive""
- Next in thread: Laura: "Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive""
- Reply: Laura: "Re: We have the basic elements for a "warp drive""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|