Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity
From: Jim Greenfield (greenfield_7_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: Donald G. Shead: "Re: The definition of weight"
- Previous message: David McAnally: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Next in thread: Mitchell: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Jun 2004 04:24:05 -0700
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<40D6E1DD.F989F3B9@mchsi.com>...
> David Evens wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 01:40:16 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com>
> > wrote:
> > >Mitchell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Time does end at the event horizon.
> > >
> > > It has been pointed out to you several times that this is not
> > > true for the general case. Get yourself a copy of [and work
> > > the problems in]:
> > >
> > > "Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity"
> > > Taylor & Wheeler
> > > New York W H Freeman, c1992,
> > > QC173.65 T37 1991,
> > > 530.1/1 20,
> > > ISBN 0716723271
> >
> > Yo, Sam! What's with the multipost?
>
> Problems with my ISP--Every indication that the posting attempts
> failed. Seem OK now. Apologies to all.
Bull***! An obvious case of "getting the stutters"
where oh where are the "thousands of experiments which prove SR" ????????
Jim G
- Next message: Donald G. Shead: "Re: The definition of weight"
- Previous message: David McAnally: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Next in thread: Mitchell: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]