Re: Radius of electron

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 06/23/04 

Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:23:00 +0200

V.K.Tamhane wrote:
> "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<cba7ui$qhs$1@sparta.btinternet.com>...
>

[snip]

>>The sentence to which I objected talked about the radius of the
>>electron, and not the classical radius of the electron.
>>
>>Franz
>
>
> Oh God! You are worse than a lawyer.

Hint: the distinction between those two terms is very important.

Bye,
Bjoern

Relevant Pages

  • Re: why cant fields be quantized too?
    ... atom's electronic motion has been solved using SFT; it's velocity and radius at all times have been derived ... Hint: *claiming* that you have derived how the electron moves does not ... applications where QFT currently derives only probability densities such as the nuclear motion will follow. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Radius of electron
    ... V ertner Vergon wrote: ... > The electron has no surface. ... >>especially the measured cross sections, ... Hint: the scattering does not occur to electrons hitting on another. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Radius of electron
    ... V ertner Vergon wrote: ... > The electron has no surface. ... >>especially the measured cross sections, ... Hint: the scattering does not occur to electrons hitting on another. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Strich Book
    ... What's a non-massive electron? ... does the nature of mass differ in each case? ... Hint: A question is technically not an answer. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Radius of electron
    ... >>electron, and not the classical radius of the electron. ... You are worse than a lawyer. ... Hint: the distinction between those two terms is very important. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)