Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity

From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 06/24/04 

Date: 23 Jun 2004 17:20:58 -0700

fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote in message news:<fd0fc2fa.0406211602.42c9e78e@posting.google.com>...
> macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell) wrote in message news:<9c3da975.0406202247.3eb9929e@posting.google.com>...
>
> [snip]
>
> Im not going to argue points picemeal this time.
>
> Time dilation has been observed. Look at
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html#Bailey
>
> You have D'Iverno's book on relativity. Open the fucking thing and
> read it.
>
> Also, mark your snips. I will not make the effort to argue point by
> point if points get snipped and ignored without comment or even
> acknowledgment.
>
> I am yet to see a cohesive explanation as to why a photon's energy
> approaching 0 is a problem.
>
> Gravity is not infinite at the event horizon. I like the classical
> Newtonian approach, which happens to give the same result as the
> Schwarzchild solution. I know about the dire warnings of using
> Newtonian mechanics, I have hopefully learned from some of those
> mistakes.
>
> mg = mMGr^-2
>
> g = MGr^-2
>
> .5mv^2 = mgd [the maximum kinetic energy of a particle is equal to the
> acelleration of gravity times the distance from the point where the
> acelleration is measured]
>
> .5v^2 = gd [mass cancels]
>
> v = sqrt(2gd)
>
> v = sqrt(2MG/r^2) [a term in there should look familiar if you read
> any book on black holes that involves a little math]
>
> This is the escape velocity equation of a mass.
>
> Set v = c. Consider a result of SR, and you have the event horizon,
> more or less.
>
> Do notice, that at the point where v = c, g is a lot smaller than
> infinity - which was my point.

Hey Geek, the slowdown of time in gravity is absolute.
It ends at the event horizon.

Quantcast