Re: = c + v (train)

From: Eric Gisse (fsegg_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 06/25/04 

Date: 24 Jun 2004 19:58:09 -0700

"Keith Stein" <ks012a2355@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:<AxICc.213$mL2.195@nurse.blueyonder.net>...
> <jimp@specsol-spam-sux.com> wrote in message
> news:cbf4dt$39t$1@mail.specsol.com...
> > Keith Stein <ks012a2355@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > 1. Synchronise two clocks
> > > 2. Take one to the International Space Station.
> > > 3. D days later take up the other.
> > > 4. Compare the two clocks on the ISS.
>
> > > And what would a relativist predict as the difference in the clock
> > > readings when compared on the ISS, Mr. Wormley ?
>
> > > And what was it when it was measured, in the "real world" Sam?
>
> > > keith stein
> >
> > This experiment has been done to death.
> >
> > Are you too stupid or lazy to look this up?
>
> The experiment has never been "done" at all,
> and when it is the results will not confirm SR,
> and your name isn't Mr. Wormley or Sam, but
> if you do want to leap in a threat that's fine by me
> IF YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION eh!

We have the duality of stupid and lazy going on here.

Hafele, Keating.
Baily.
Pound, Rebka.

Gosh, they seem to confirm SR instead of disprove it.

Why do you insist on spraying your twaddle across the cyberscape day
in and day out when you have no clue about what the *** your talking
about?

Go visit an academic library and READ.

>
> So what would a relativist predict as the difference in the clock
> readings when compared on the ISS, Mr. Pennino ?

Why do you ask? You ignore the answer every time.

>
> > Every time something new high and fast goes up do we have to do the
> > experiment again to show you that, yes, the results agree with the
> > theory this time too?
> >
> > And if the experiment was done yet again would you read the results and
> > be able to understand them?
> >
> > Idiot.
> >
> > --
> > Jim Pennino
>
> And what was it when it was measured, in the "real world" Jim?

Idiot.

Quantcast