Re: The Fifth Dimension
From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: Observing a Photon no Longer a Seek-and-Destroy Mission"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Orthogonal Eigenfunctions"
- In reply to: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Next in thread: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Reply: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Reply: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:01:51 +0800
"Leonard Pardin" <leoppard@MailAndNews.com> wrote in message
news:d746a243.0406231547.6111f3db@posting.google.com...
> "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<2jtlc0F159smvU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> > "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
> > news:40D8F438.58186A76@mchsi.com...
> > > Leonard Pardin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > With that revelation enlightening my once moribund brain, I
> > > > realized there was still another dimension that should be taken into
> > > > consideration--color! Everything has color, and color can change
just
> > > > like all other tangible and measurable things. Color has heft, just
> > > > like Einstein's empty space. It can be related to mass, velocity,
> > > > force, energy, gravity, and light. Color travels at the speed of
> > > > light, yet seems to stay attached to the mass until acted upon by an
> > > > outside action. Objects moving relative to each other will appear
to
> > > > be of a different color depending on the frame of reference and the
> > > > velocity.
> > > >
> > > > I'm working out the mathematics. But I have already solved one
> > > > paradox found in relativity. Twins traveling in space away from
each
> > > > other do not age differently--they just change color.
> > >
> > > Color is nothing more than the way your eye-brain responds to
different
> > > frequencies of visible light--An evolutioary process of life on
Earth.
> > >
> > > You are not understanding the Twin Paradox.
> >
> > It looks like Sammy doesn't understand the Color Paradox.
> >
> > Deep thoughts!
> > Why are some people blue on Monday?
> > Why are cowards yellow?
> >
> > Think of all the discoveries that could be made,
> > if some of the billions of dollars wasted on G.R. research
> > into worm holes, warped space, time travel, black holes, etc.
> > were spent on color research.
> >
> > God speed on your research Leonard Pardin.
>
> My deepest thanks for the encouragement. Being on the cutting
> edge is a lonely experience. Now I know how Gallileo must have felt.
> Someday, perhaps, the more common people will recognize the validity
> of the Theory of Colorivity.
>
> But you bring up a most interesting subject: money being spent
> pursuing some rather vague scientific theories. I myself hope to get
> government funding for my own work. With that in mind, I thought
> perhaps I could share with you my latest theory and ask your honest
> opinion.
>
> I have stumbled upon a profound truth in nature: the velocity of
> dark in a vacuum is a constant, and it turns out to be equal and
> opposite to the velocity of light. The discovery can be stated by
> the equation dk = -c, where dk is the velocity of dark and c is the
> velocity of light. While the phenomena have similarities, their
> effects on the motion of bodies is completely different.
>
> I noticed that in most of Einstein's scientific setups in
> relativity, the clocks always seem to use light bouncing back and
> forth as a means of keeping time. Einstein showed how clocks using
> light in that way would not keep the same time in different reference
> frames moving relative to each other at a constant velocity. Well, I
> have discovered that if the clocks are all traveling in dark, with no
> light anywhere, they woud keep exactly the same time no matter what
> their relative velocities. The solution to the twin paradox is simply
> to allow the twins to travel in complete darkness.
>
> But there's much more to my theory than simplifying such trivial
> mind games as the twin paradox. The Pardin Dark Theory leads to the
> solution to one of the most mystifying of natural phenomenon:
> antimatter. I know how important mathematics is to physics, so I
> present the mathematical derivation for your consideration
>
> Remember that under the Pardin theory, dk = -c. Multiplying both
> sides by -1, we get c = - dk. This revelation leads to some
> interesting results. If we write Einstein's e = mc^2 as c^2 = e/m, we
> can get
> _____
> c = \/ e/m. Substituting -dk for c, we get
> ____
> -dk = \/e/m.
>
> Again multiplying both sides by -1, and we have
> ____
> dk = - \/e/m.
>
> The result must be a negative number for both mass and energy.
> In other words, I have determined the source of antimatter.
>
> Now be honest, Mr. Potter. Be brutal. Don't be afraid to hurt my
> feelings. Do you think the government would be willing to fund my
> work, considering all the money spent on trying to prove Einstein's
> theories, and worm holes, warped space, time travel, black holes,
> etc.?
You are obviously on to something big,
and it is clear that your model is more powerful
than current models, because it not only addresses
the discrete/continuous problem,
but it also addresses the sentient/non-sentient problem.
As can be seen from the experiences of the Delphi Oracle,
Nostrademus , the Aztecs, and as you noted, the success of GR,
it is desirable to have a model that is very flexible,
and whose results can be interpreted numerous ways.
Your model is even better than GR at this.
I doubt that you will be able to get government money
unless you make your ideas appeal to
people based on their race, religion and nationality.
If you put enough money into popularizing
your ideas, you could brainwash the masses,
regardless of their race, religion or nationality,
and get them to support your work, but of course,
the brainwashing approach costs lots of seed money,
and works best after you have institutionalized your ideas
with racial, religious and national associations.
In other words, your best approach
would be to associate your ideas with a small,
highly emotional, religious, racial or national group
and set up some kind of pyramid scheme to implement it.
Of course, this might take a few hundred years,
and I don't know if you are willing to invest this much
time to educate the masses, and reap the power and profit
from your ideas.
Personally, I don't like to get involved in projects
that have a payoff in less than two hundred years,
but if you set up a cult that can profit from your model,
they should be able to reap the benefits.
-- Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: Observing a Photon no Longer a Seek-and-Destroy Mission"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Orthogonal Eigenfunctions"
- In reply to: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Next in thread: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Reply: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Reply: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
