Re: The Fifth Dimension
From: Elk (flobbins77_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/27/04
- Next message: Elk: "Re: Gravity"
- Previous message: abhilsah j: "Re: would u please help me clear this doubt (thought experiment)"
- In reply to: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Next in thread: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Reply: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:51:08 -0700
> All that you have to fall back on is your pathetic
> > "Big Picture" philosophy, where you deny yourself learning even of
> > Newtonian mechanics, on the basis that learning would destroy the bloom
of
> > your ignorance (to pursue an analogy used by Lady Bracknell), and it
would
> > destroy the deep understanding of physics that you think your complete
> > ignorance of the subject gives you.
>
> That may be true, but my clock keeps better time than yours. So
> there.
>
Math comes before physics. It is the *backbone* and physics is absolutely
nothing without it. How would you know if your clock keeps better time than
his? You haven't shown any kind of predictable measurement. For all of you
that ignore the math behind physics, you are not a physicist anymore, you're
a *metaphysicists*.
Physics *is* math.
- Next message: Elk: "Re: Gravity"
- Previous message: abhilsah j: "Re: would u please help me clear this doubt (thought experiment)"
- In reply to: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Next in thread: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Reply: Leonard Pardin: "Re: The Fifth Dimension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|