Re: The Fifth Dimension

From: Leonard Pardin (leoppard_at_MailAndNews.com)
Date: 06/29/04 

Date: 28 Jun 2004 19:03:22 -0700

D.McAnally@i'm_a_gnu.uq.net.au (David McAnally) wrote in message news:
> leoppard@MailAndNews.com (Leonard Pardin) writes:

> >Einstein's followers offer
> >the nonsensical explanation that particles have frequencies.

> That is in Quantum Mechanics, for which, as I have already pointed out to
> you, Einstein was not a principal investigator.

     McaAnally, I am beginning to think you have never read Einstein.
You yourself said particles are necessary to explain the photoelectric
effect, and that was supposed to be Einstein's prize-winning paper.
Here's what Einstein said about it in that paper:

     "In accordance with the assumption to be considered here, the
energy of a light ray spreading out from a point source is not
continuously distributed over an increasing space, but consists of a
finite number of energy quanta which are localized at points in space,
which move without dividing, and which can only be produced and
absorbed as complete units."

     So there is your dopey deity talking about "localized points in
space which move with out dividing." If Einstein is not talking about
particles, then you lied about particles being necessary to explain
the photoelectric effect. If he is talking about particles, then you
keep lying by insisting that Einstein is not the one who claimed
particles have "frequencies."

    Now, stop all your childish tantrums, go play with your
mathematics, and let the grownups discuss the the problems with modern
physics.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Position Without Space
    ... a single new fundamental breakthrough in physics for over a century. ... Louis, the poor guy, reminds me of being a mullah in Jerusalem ... like "particles" in his theory did not go over too well. ... Let's face it, Newton, Einstein and Savain, all are describing, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Looking for answers.
    ... >> have no education in mathematics or physics. ... or is my assumption, that particles ... > collection of dust all at rest, gravity would pull them all together. ... >> einstein did, without any mathematical understanding of the ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Einsteins thoughts on particle nature of light
    ... > I think Einstein understood quite well the troubles of explaining ... > the interference in the language of particles. ... > the idea of photons, because it was the only plausible explanation of ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Mark Issak - Shot Dead
    ... David Ewan Kahana wrote: ... >>> According to conventional quantum field theory and conventional ... >>> very limited class of particles. ... > Einstein did make at least two famous `wrong' predictions. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
    ... space being an illusion. ... "The purpose of the paper of Einstein and Rosen was not to promote ... fundamental particles like electrons as space-tunnels threaded by ... The inside of each proton is constantly being actively evacuated to form huge numbers of mini- black holes which conglomerate into mini suns and planets and spiral away from their centers. ...
    (sci.physics)