Re: UFO Pocket Detector
From: nightbat (nightbat_at_home.ffni.com)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Does the Electron Neutrino Have Mass and Charge?"
- Previous message: Rene Tschaggelar: "Re: pressure at the end of a hose"
- Maybe in reply to: nightbat: "UFO Pocket Detector"
- Next in thread: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: UFO Pocket Detector"
- Reply: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: UFO Pocket Detector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 04:40:20 -0500
nightbat wrote
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
>
> Hi nightbat I've posted the fastest speed the human body can take is
> 94% of 'c' However I have a theory that space in the direction the
> spaceship is going will foreshorten. So even at 94% of "c' you could get
> from A to B in a much shorter time. When Darla final shows pictures of
> her flying saucer it will show no engines. Nor does her space craft have
> any internal engines. It is propelled by pulse drive. In truth whole
> outside surface of her space craft is its driving(push force) nightbat
> that is why the moving pictures of flying sources show they change
> direction so fast. The metal skin of Darla's spacecraft is solid
> hydrogen atoms,and these atoms have the same structure of a bucky ball
> (60 hydrogen atoms to make the ball) The structure of a bucky ball
> makes it the strongest structure in the universe.
> Well I would like to say these thoughts came out of my brain,but it was
> Treb that put them there. He has an alien girl friend called "Alrad"
> Bert
nightbat
Not a bad concept Bert, if a ship hull were made of exotic hyper
strong force nucleus electron counter spin matter which therefore had an
anti gravitational effect, then just particular controlled counter
gravitational orientation would be needed to stabilize and direct the
craft in normal matter gravity fields. Its flight pattern would not be
conventional but could still maneuver horizontal and vertically along
curved combined preplotted vector trajectories. The question presents
where would they harvest said strange stable matter atoms to make the
ships hull out of? It would need to be presumably in a form of condensed
strong gravity field formed or even anti matter but in a very stable or
reverse spin atomic nucleus shell configuration of which we presently
know nothing about but theoretically possible. Free matter-anti matter
particles normally would quantum annihilate each other as they came in
mutual contact, however, theoretically in a protective formed stronger
stable atom or counter base atomic nucleus arrangement, and further in
group atomic compound, composite, or non normal gravity field lattice
formed ship configuration, the results could be quite different. Still
the residual ion radiation effects of contact with normal matter would
theoretically present as higher impacted spin to contacting normal
particles but not particularly to self alter matter atomic
destabilization or annihilation itself, and remember, theoretically.
the nightbat
- Next message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Does the Electron Neutrino Have Mass and Charge?"
- Previous message: Rene Tschaggelar: "Re: pressure at the end of a hose"
- Maybe in reply to: nightbat: "UFO Pocket Detector"
- Next in thread: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: UFO Pocket Detector"
- Reply: G=EMC^2 Glazier: "Re: UFO Pocket Detector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|