Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".

From: Owamanga (nomail_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/29/04 

Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:20:07 GMT

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:07:23 -0700, "AbsolutelyCertain"
<easily@entertained.net> wrote:

>
>"Geoff Cashman" <theobviousgcashman@theobviousindiana.edu> wrote in message
>news:cbsefe$80a$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu...
>> In article <briEc.1511$876.194@fed1read07>,
>> Harvey <researchermd@netscape.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >Oh, don't you think a high speed crash site is a pretty chaotic
>environment?
>> >Know anything about how surprising those are? Or indeed even know what
>I'm
>> >referring to? Or have you done so many tests crashing 757s into low rise
>> >buildings that you *know* to a high degree of statistical power the
>> >probability all the possible outcomes?
>> >
>>
>> Responding to Jason is like screaming at a wall. Actually, it's worse
>> than that. This idiot talks back. He's incapable of answering basic
>> questions about his pet conspiracy theory, yet insists that everyone
>> and their pet dog's second cousin's twin parakeet come up with an
>> explanation about the second engine.
>>
>> Now let's remember; plane crashes are not chaotic events! Planes
>> leave their debris in nice neat little piles for the NTSB to sift
>> through, so as to not cost taxpayers any more money than necessary.
>
>Yes, I think it is mandated that the debris piles arrange the scraps in
>alphabetical order, and that each shard be photographed and catalogued for
>perpetual public retrieval.

Wouldn't everything be in the 'T' pile? - "Twisted metal"

I think some here would like to see the 'S' pile. - "Second Engine"

And the 'M' pile, of course, is hidden in a bunker. - "Missile parts"

Behind a fence nearby, nervously staring at the hole and scribbling
things onto their wireless PDA's stands the living 'C' pile.

"Conspirawackos"