Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".

From: Walter Sickert (kill_at_killkill.org)
Date: 06/29/04 

Date: 29 Jun 2004 19:56:56 GMT

theobviousgcashman@theobviousindiana.edu (Geoff Cashman) wrote in
news:cbsh92$8vj$2@hood.uits.indiana.edu:

> In article <l9g3e0phjibm3vctt30kr04sn58mhl4u1p@4ax.com>,
> Owamanga <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On 29 Jun 2004 19:17:02 GMT, Walter Sickert <kill@killkill.org> wrote:
>>>That's a pretty poor explanation for what happened to the right side
>>>engine.
>>>
>>>If overly wordly.
>>>
>>>
>>>Did the engine:
>>>
>>>Enter the Pentagon?
>>>
>>>Exit the Pentagon?
>>>
>>>Explode?
>>>
>>>Fly over the Pentagon?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Which was it?
>>
>>Shhhhh, you'r supposed to be dead, remember?
>
>
> <Walter Sickert aka Jason>
> BRAWK! Where'd the second engine go? BRAWK!
> I've got nothing else on which to base my conspiracy theory! BRAWK!
> Wally Wanna A Cracker! BRAWK!
> </Walter Sickert aka Jason>

It is one of many reasons to doubt the Pentagon story.

http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon

> See my earlier comments regarding this nitwit. He's just
> desperate for attention. If people stop responding to him,
> he'll go away.
>
> -Geoff
 
You might start with following your own advice.