sci.physics
By Thread

10002 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 06/30/04
Ending: 07/31/04

• Universal Truths: Distant quasars reveal content, age of universe Sam Wormley (07/31/04)
• Where does intelligence come from? * Mitchell (07/31/04)
  • Re: Where does intelligence come from? * Sam Wormley (07/31/04)
  • Re: Where does intelligence come from? * Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
• Re: Unified Sub-Quanta Force, Energy and Mass. Sam Wormley (07/31/04)
• Re: Atomic Warfare In Ancient India ???? habshi (07/31/04)
  • Re: Atomic Warfare In Ancient India ???? Uncle Al (07/31/04)
• Re: [OT] threading Thomas Edison (07/31/04)
  • Re: [OT] threading Thomas Edison (07/31/04)
• Icemaker habshi (07/31/04)
  • Re: Icemaker Richard Henry (07/31/04)
• DR. B V RAMAN - A PROFILE Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/31/04)
• Hubble discovers 100 new planets sid myers (07/31/04)
• Entanglement breaks new record sid myers (07/30/04)
  • Re: Entanglement breaks new record Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
• NEW!!! NEW!!! Website containing Hawkings BH information paper. Julian Streicher (07/30/04)
  • Re: NEW!!! NEW!!! Website containing Hawkings BH information paper. davidoff404 (07/31/04)
• Lunar rock sheds new light on the Moon Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
  • Re: Lunar rock sheds new light on the Moon tj Frazir (07/30/04)
• What's New -- Friday, July 30, 2004 by Bob Park Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
• Electronic skin could give machines a sophisticated sense of touch. sid myers (07/30/04)
• Proving that the world record superconductor is the upper limit Archimedes Plutonium (07/30/04)
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 July 2004 Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
• Bring Back the HP 15C Scientific Calculator Chris W (07/30/04)
• The most abundant compound in Earth? Pascal Damian (07/30/04)
  • Re: The most abundant compound in Earth? frankly (07/30/04)
  • Re: The most abundant compound in Earth? Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: The most abundant compound in Earth? Uncle Al (07/30/04)
  • Re: The most abundant compound in Earth? Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
• End of the Line for Hubble? Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
  • Re: End of the Line for Hubble? Andrew B. Park (07/24/04)
  • Re: End of the Line for Hubble? Mick (07/30/04)
• Lyman Alpha Forest Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
• The Source of Gravitational Energy Sdraobhw (07/30/04)
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy Uncle Al (07/30/04)
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
    • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy ZZBunker (07/30/04)
• Does Hell Exist Scientifically Speaking? Smart1234 S. Enterprize Company (07/30/04)
  • Re: Does Hell Exist Scientifically Speaking? Smart1234 John Zinni (07/30/04)
  • Re: Does Hell Exist Scientifically Speaking? Smart1234 frankly (07/30/04)
  • Re: Does Hell Exist Scientifically Speaking? Smart1234 Double-A (07/31/04)
• [OT] threading (was: The ultimate luxury ?) Johan Lindquist (07/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] threading (was: The ultimate luxury ?) Johan Lindquist (07/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] threading (was: The ultimate luxury ?) Johan Lindquist (07/30/04)
  • Re: [OT] threading (was: The ultimate luxury ?) Paul Murray (07/30/04)
  • [OT] threading (was: The ultimate luxury ?) Jeff Relf (07/31/04)
• The electron shell model is in challenge Y.Porat (07/30/04)
  • Re: The electron shell model is in challenge Uncle Al (07/30/04)
  • Re: The electron shell model is in challenge Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
• UPANISHADS AND THE UNIVERSE Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
  • Re: UPANISHADS AND THE UNIVERSE Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/30/04)
    • Re: UPANISHADS AND THE UNIVERSE Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
  • Re: UPANISHADS AND THE UNIVERSE Uncle Al (07/30/04)
    • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Uncle Al (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr_Postman (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> John Griffin (07/31/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr_Postman (07/30/04)
  • Re: UPANISHADS AND THE UNIVERSE frankly (07/30/04)
• RARE EQUIPMENT ROTS IN DU PHYSICS LAB Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
  • Re: RARE EQUIPMENT ROTS IN DU PHYSICS LAB Uncle Al (07/30/04)
    • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Uncle Al (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
      • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Uncle Al (07/30/04)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• Conventional Fusion FAQ Section 0/11 (Intro) Part 1/3 (Overview) Robert F. Heeter (07/30/04)
• Gravity is a Continuum Mitchell (07/30/04)
  • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Uncle Al (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Mitchell (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
  • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum ZZBunker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum tj Frazir (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Mitchell (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Dale Trynor (07/31/04)
  • Re: Gravity is a Continuum davidoff404 (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum tj Frazir (07/30/04)
• What is the difference between a White object and a Mirror? GruntHunter (07/30/04)
  • Re: What is the difference between a White object and a Mirror? Uncle Al (07/30/04)
• Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Ole D. Rughede (07/29/04)
• All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe News Captian (07/29/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
    • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe John Morriss (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Poker Joker (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe half_pint (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Eddie (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Maleki (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe David Bandel (07/30/04)
  • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe tuna (07/30/04)
    • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Jim (07/30/04)
    • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Herman Family (07/30/04)
    • Re: All changes in velocity are either acceleration of the observers and/or acceleration of that which they observe Donald G. Shead (07/30/04)
• 20,000-lb. Bus vs. Pedestrian -- Analogy Sought Jeekay2004 (07/29/04)
  • Re: 20,000-lb. Bus vs. Pedestrian -- Analogy Sought frankly (07/29/04)
  • Re: 20,000-lb. Bus vs. Pedestrian -- Analogy Sought Ian Stirling (07/29/04)
  • Resonse to Ian & Frankly Jeekay2004 (07/29/04)
    • Re: Resonse to Ian & Frankly Ian Stirling (07/30/04)
  • Re: 20,000-lb. Bus vs. Pedestrian -- Analogy Sought Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: 20,000-lb. Bus vs. Pedestrian -- Analogy Sought David Rysdam (07/30/04)
  • To "Frankly" re: 1.65-lb. Tomato Jeekay2004 (07/30/04)
    • Re: To "Frankly" re: 1.65-lb. Tomato frankly (07/30/04)
• My priorities. Jeff Relf (07/29/04)
  • Re: My priorities. Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Another broken link from a broken Uncle Al. Jeff Relf (07/29/04)
  • Re: My priorities. Tom Potter (07/30/04)
    • Re: My priorities. Double-A (07/31/04)
      • Re: My priorities. Thomas Edison (07/31/04)
      • Re: My priorities. Jeff Relf (07/31/04)
    • Re: My priorities. Jeff Relf (07/31/04)
  • Re: My priorities. mitch perkins (07/30/04)
    • Are you sadistic, poor, or just stupid ? Jeff Relf (07/31/04)
• Analog or Digital Sina Tootoonian (07/29/04)
  • Re: Analog or Digital FrediFizzx (07/29/04)
  • Re: Analog or Digital Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: Analog or Digital Tom Potter (07/30/04)
      • Re: Analog or Digital Old Man (07/30/04)
  • Re: Analog or Digital s Stine (07/30/04)
• Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/29/04)
  • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
    • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/29/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/29/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/30/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Alex Green (07/30/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/30/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Alex Green (07/30/04)
      • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/30/04)
  • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Mike Helland (07/29/04)
  • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Spaceman (07/29/04)
  • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
  • Re: Capitalization of Relativity and Quantum Jim Black (07/30/04)
• Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement Dave Jarvis (07/29/04)
  • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement John Schoenfeld (07/29/04)
  • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement half_pint (07/30/04)
    • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement Dave Jarvis (07/30/04)
      • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement half_pint (07/30/04)
    • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement Dave Jarvis (07/30/04)
      • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement half_pint (07/30/04)
  • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/30/04)
    • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement West Coast Engineering (07/30/04)
      • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement AES/newspost (07/30/04)
  • Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement Brent (07/31/04)
• A group of physilcists claim radiation that circumvents inverse square law Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: A group of physilcists claim radiation that circumvents inverse square law Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: A group of physilcists claim radiation that circumvents inverse square law Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
    • Re: A group of physilcists claim radiation that circumvents inverse square law François Guillet (07/30/04)
      • Re: A group of physilcists claim radiation that circumvents inverse square law puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/30/04)
• Fusion Barrier Principle Re: fusion Archimedes Plutonium (07/29/04)
• Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory nightbat (07/29/04)
  • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Mad Scientist (07/29/04)
    • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Dale Trynor (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory nightbat (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory vonroach (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Dale Trynor (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Dale Trynor (07/30/04)
• Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Jack Sarfatti (07/29/04)
  • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Xerxes (07/30/04)
    • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 John Baker (07/30/04)
  • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Bob Chipeska (07/30/04)
    • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Richard Herring (07/30/04)
• Future Neural Interfacing Concepts sid myers (07/29/04)
  • Re: Future Neural Interfacing Concepts Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: Future Neural Interfacing Concepts Mark Fergerson (07/29/04)
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Creighton Hogg (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F.Schewe, Ben Stein Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Gregory L. Hansen (07/30/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein Gregory L. Hansen (07/31/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 694 July 29, 2004 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein John Sefton (07/30/04)
• The Fundamental Flaw of SR kenseto (07/29/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR kenseto (07/29/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR The Ghost In The Machine (07/30/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR kenseto (07/29/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR kenseto (07/29/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR Gregory L. Hansen (07/30/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR kenseto (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR Gregory L. Hansen (07/30/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR Alex Green (07/30/04)
• The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Sivleqw (07/29/04)
  • Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
• Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/29/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. JonTi (07/29/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/29/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. JonTi (07/30/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/31/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. ZZBunker (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. ueb (07/30/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Albert (07/30/04)
• Parabola vs Ellipse Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Robert J. Kolker (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Jaraham Wellington Smythe (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse John T Lowry (07/29/04)
    • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Jaraham Wellington Smythe (07/29/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Lee Rudolph (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
    • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Dik T. Winter (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Dik T. Winter (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Dik T. Winter (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Dik T. Winter (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Hans-Peter Schroecker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Hans-Peter Schroecker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse JM Albuquerque (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Randy Poe (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Randy Poe (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Randy Poe (07/30/04)
      • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Gregory L. Hansen (07/30/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Narasimham G.L. (07/30/04)
  • Re: Parabola vs Ellipse Mike (07/30/04)
• Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! Ed Conrad (07/29/04)
  • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
    • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! John Sefton (07/29/04)
      • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
    • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! mitch perkins (07/29/04)
  • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! John Sefton (07/29/04)
  • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! danh (07/29/04)
  • Re: Other Human Life in Universe? Yes, INDEED! Mr. 4X (07/29/04)
• Oh, Shit! Not MORE Anthracite Fossils Ed Conrad (07/29/04)
  • Re: Oh, Shit! Not MORE Anthracite Fossils Dave Monroe (07/29/04)
• Research and Development 100 Award for A New Method that Simplifies Protein Production Neutron (07/29/04)
• Re: Why is america so succesful? somebody intelligent (07/29/04)
• "The map is not the Territory"... Paul Stowe (07/29/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Martin Hogbin (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Gerry (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Gerry (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Gerry (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... frankly (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Oriel36 (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... frankly (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... greywolf42 (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... greywolf42 (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Robert J. Kolker (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Robert J. Kolker (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/31/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Harry (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stephen_at_nomail.com (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Sandman (07/29/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Paul Stowe (07/30/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Tom Roberts (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Paul Stowe (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Tom Roberts (07/31/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Andr? Michaud (07/30/04)
• Min's Essay #4 - Nostradamus Quatrain X72 Daniel Joseph Min (07/29/04)
• Liquid separation goes electric Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: Liquid separation goes electric Ian Stirling (07/29/04)
• Everything was thrown apart Mitchell (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart MorituriMax (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Jan Kalin (07/29/04)
    • Re: Everything was thrown apart Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
• ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (07/29/04)
• ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (07/29/04)
• Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Donald G. Shead (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Jaraham Wellington Smythe (07/28/04)
    • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
      • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
      • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Jaraham Wellington Smythe (07/29/04)
  • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Sam Wormley (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
  • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
    • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
      • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
  • Galileo's inertial and free fall motion so fall off your high chair and die horribly Everyone hates you (07/29/04)
    • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion so fall off your high chair and die horribly Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
    • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion so fall off your high chair and die horribly Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
      • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion so fall off your high chair and die horribly Jaraham Wellington Smythe (07/29/04)
    • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion so fall off your high chair and die horribly Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion George Kinley (07/29/04)
  • Re: Galileo's inertial and free fall motion Mike (07/29/04)
• DR. B. V. RAMAN - A PROFILE Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/28/04)
  • Re: DR. B. V. RAMAN - A PROFILE Dan Baldwin (07/28/04)
  • Re: DR. B. V. RAMAN - A PROFILE Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/31/04)
  • Re: DR. B. V. RAMAN - A PROFILE markd_at_toad-net.com (07/29/04)
• THE CORRUPTION OF SCIENCE Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/28/04)
  • Re: THE CORRUPTION OF SCIENCE Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: THE CORRUPTION OF SCIENCE Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: How to handle 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/29/04)
  • re:THE CORRUPTION OF SCIENCE herbert (07/30/04)
• [OT] A Mildly Interesting Observation Jim Black (07/28/04)
• GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/28/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Richard Ulrich (07/28/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/28/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Rick Cvejic (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Rick Cvejic (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Henry (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Evgenij Barsukov (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Evgenij Barsukov (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Evgenij Barsukov (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % The Ghost In The Machine (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Pyriform (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % The Ghost In The Machine (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Pyriform (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
• Sonofagun! Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: Sonofagun! FrediFizzx (07/28/04)
    • Re: Sonofagun! Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sonofagun! jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sonofagun! FrediFizzx (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sonofagun! John Popelish (07/29/04)
  • Re: Sonofagun! Isaac Wingfield (07/29/04)
• Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! guitaristx (07/28/04)
  • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! Greg Neill (07/28/04)
  • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! Goran Jakupovic (07/28/04)
    • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! guitaristx (07/29/04)
      • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! Goran Jakupovic (07/29/04)
      • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! guitaristx (07/30/04)
  • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! Jim Greenfield (07/29/04)
    • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! ZZBunker (07/30/04)
    • Re: Hypothetical question about digging to the center of the earth - need Calculus guru! Richard Herring (07/30/04)
• do sound frequency more than 20000Hz hurt us? yogesh (07/28/04)
  • Re: do sound frequency more than 20000Hz hurt us? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/28/04)
    • Re: do sound frequency more than 20000Hz hurt us? yogesh (07/29/04)
      • Re: do sound frequency more than 20000Hz hurt us? jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/29/04)
  • re:do sound frequency more than 20000Hz hurt us? herbert (07/29/04)
• Bohr's planetary model for the atom. John Sefton (07/28/04)
  • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. John Sefton (07/28/04)
      • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. Sam Wormley (07/28/04)
      • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. John C. Polasek (07/28/04)
      • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. Pyriform (07/28/04)
      • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. John Sefton (07/29/04)
      • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. Pyriform (07/29/04)
  • Re: Bohr's planetary model for the atom. Gregory L. Hansen (07/29/04)
• (Anti)symmetrization of multi-particle states Mark (07/28/04)
• About the evidence and relativity Mike Helland (07/28/04)
  • Re: About the evidence and relativity Jesper Pedersen (07/28/04)
  • Re: About the evidence and relativity Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: About the evidence and relativity Mike Helland (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Uncle Al (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Mike Helland (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Gregory L. Hansen (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Jon Bell (07/28/04)
  • Re: About the evidence and relativity puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/28/04)
    • Re: About the evidence and relativity Gregory L. Hansen (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Jesper Pedersen (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Gregory L. Hansen (07/29/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Creighton Hogg (07/28/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Robert J. Kolker (07/28/04)
  • Re: About the evidence and relativity Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
    • Re: About the evidence and relativity Mike Helland (07/29/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Mike Helland (07/30/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Mike Helland (07/30/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Tom Potter (07/30/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: About the evidence and relativity Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
    • Re: About the evidence and relativity Igor (07/30/04)
  • re:About the evidence and relativity DAH (07/29/04)
• Galileo didn't do velocity Donald G. Shead (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity Robert J. Kolker (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity Always Right (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity MrPepper11 (07/28/04)
    • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity tadchem (07/28/04)
      • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
      • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity Randy Poe (07/29/04)
      • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity tadchem (07/29/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity The Ghost In The Machine (07/29/04)
  • Re: Galileo didn't do velocity tadchem (07/29/04)
• Probability of God Evgenij Barsukov (07/28/04)
  • Re: Probability of God Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Probability of God S. Enterprize Company (07/28/04)
      • Re: Probability of God Igor (07/29/04)
      • Re: Probability of God Evgenij Barsukov (07/29/04)
      • Re: Probability of God Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: Probability of God Evgenij Barsukov (07/29/04)
      • Re: Probability of God Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
• Re: Hearing Telepathy Underneath Kulrad Hellbar (07/28/04)
  • Re: Hearing Telepathy Underneath Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: Hearing Telepathy Underneath John Sefton (07/28/04)
    • Re: Hearing Telepathy Underneath Joe Horowitz (07/28/04)
• Raising the Bar for Cantilevers Sam Wormley (07/28/04)
• Will the LIGO Experiment Work? Cigamtp (07/28/04)
  • Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? Sam Wormley (07/28/04)
  • Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? Uncle Al (07/28/04)
• Visualizing photon V.K.Tamhane (07/28/04)
  • Re: Visualizing photon Nick (07/28/04)
    • Re: Visualizing photon V.K.Tamhane (07/30/04)
      • Re: Visualizing photon N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/30/04)
  • Re: Visualizing photon Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Visualizing photon V.K.Tamhane (07/29/04)
• the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) mountain man (07/28/04)
  • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
    • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) mountain man (07/28/04)
      • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) Dr Smith (07/28/04)
  • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) Sam Wormley (07/28/04)
  • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) Robert J. Kolker (07/28/04)
    • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) mountain man (07/28/04)
      • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
  • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/28/04)
  • Re: the scientific basis of astrology - Seymour (Plymouth) MrPepper11 (07/29/04)
• Re: Gravity Symmetry Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: Gravity Symmetry Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Gravity Symmetry tj Frazir (07/29/04)
  • Re: Gravity Symmetry Igor (07/29/04)
  • Re: Gravity Symmetry tj Frazir (07/29/04)
• Re: Symmetry Sam Wormley (07/28/04)
  • Re: Symmetry Uncle Al (07/28/04)
• Let's see what happens K. Jones (07/28/04)
  • Re: Let's see what happens Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Pariity for Dummys Will Janoschka (07/28/04)
      • Re: Pariity for Dummys Horst Kraemer (07/28/04)
      • Re: Pariity for Dummys Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Let's see what happens Jeff Kish (07/28/04)
      • Re: Let's see what happens The Ghost In The Machine (07/30/04)
      • Re: Let's see what happens Jeff Kish (07/30/04)
    • Re: Let's see what happens tj Frazir (07/30/04)
  • Re: Let's see what happens Boris Mohar (07/28/04)
  • Re: Let's see what happens Gregory L. Hansen (07/28/04)
    • Re: Let's see what happens Jeff Kish (07/29/04)
      • Re: Let's see what happens Gregory L. Hansen (07/29/04)
  • Re: Let's see what happens Tom Potter (07/29/04)
• Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/27/04)
  • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mike (07/29/04)
  • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
    • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/28/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Marcus Wellpoth (07/28/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/29/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles MorituriMax (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles MorituriMax (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Spaceman (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Spaceman (07/31/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/31/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles MorituriMax (07/29/04)
• How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . J. Alfred Bluefrock (07/27/04)
  • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . Robert (07/28/04)
    • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . Dr Zen (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . Robert (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . Dr Zen (07/28/04)
  • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . J. Alfred Bluefrock (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Wood Could a Wood . . . Robert (07/28/04)
• I Broke the Cosmic Egg Mitchell (07/27/04)
  • Re: I Broke the Cosmic Egg Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: I Broke the Cosmic Egg Ichimusai (07/28/04)
  • Re: Are there any Space Elevator experts here? Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Are there any Space Elevator experts here? MorituriMax (07/28/04)
    • Re: Are there any Space Elevator experts here? puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/28/04)
  • Re: Are there any Space Elevator experts here? Ian Stirling (07/28/04)
  • Re: Are there any Space Elevator experts here? stan (07/28/04)
• relation MeV (07/27/04)
  • Re: relation Uncle Al (07/27/04)
  • Re: relation puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/28/04)
    • Re: relation MeV (07/28/04)
• Interesting take on BH information loss Julian Streicher (07/27/04)
• Hawking's apology to sci-fi fans. Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
• periodic table animated John Sefton (07/27/04)
  • Re: periodic table animated Uncle Al (07/27/04)
    • Re: periodic table animated John Sefton (07/28/04)
• ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE GRAVITYMECHANIC2 (07/27/04)
  • Re: ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE Uncle Al (07/27/04)
  • Re: ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE Sam Wormley (07/27/04)
    • Re: ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/28/04)
• rotation and arc kelfe (07/27/04)
  • Re: rotation and arc Ian Stirling (07/27/04)
• Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Redneck Physicist (07/27/04)
  • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Uncle Al (07/27/04)
  • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Bruce Scott TOK (07/27/04)
  • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Gregory L. Hansen (07/27/04)
    • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Creighton Hogg (07/27/04)
      • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Gregory L. Hansen (07/27/04)
  • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there John T Lowry (07/27/04)
  • Re: Question for you Ph.D'd folks out there Redneck Physicist (07/28/04)
• Pocket QC Fierce Creatures (07/27/04)
• The Dynamical Velocity Superposition Effect in the Quantum-Foam In-Flow Theory of Gravity (Cahill - July 2004) mountain man (07/27/04)
  • Re: The Dynamical Velocity Superposition Effect in the Quantum-Foam In-Flow Theory of Gravity (Cahill - July 2004) Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
  • Re: The Dynamical Velocity Superposition Effect in the Quantum-Foam In-Flow Theory of Gravity (Cahill - July 2004) FrediFizzx (07/28/04)
• GR and the GPS - Cahill's Revised paper mountain man (07/27/04)
  • Re: GR and the GPS - Cahill's Revised paper Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
  • Re: GR and the GPS - Cahill's Revised paper Uncle Al (07/27/04)
    • Re: GR and the GPS - Cahill's Revised paper mountain man (07/28/04)
      • Re: GR and the GPS - Cahill's Revised paper Dr Smith (07/28/04)
      • Re: GR and the GPS - Cahill's Revised paper mountain man (07/28/04)
• The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems Yddubwq (07/27/04)
  • Re: The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems Sam Wormley (07/27/04)
  • Re: The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems Uncle Al (07/27/04)
• recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices mountain man (07/27/04)
  • Re: recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices Uncle Al (07/27/04)
    • Re: recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices mountain man (07/27/04)
      • Re: recent anisotropy experiments - gas vs vacuum devices Uncle Al (07/27/04)
• Koos' FAQ about the psychosis of alt.religion.scientology - summarizing eight years of experience with it - (Version 3.0) - with some Footnotes by Koos on Small and Fine Particle Physics Leonardo Been (07/27/04)
• Koos' FAQ about the psychosis of alt.religion.scientology - summarizing eight years of experience with it - (Version 3.0) - with some Footnotes by Koos on Small and Fine Particle Physics Leonardo Been (07/27/04)
• Ions in the air jriegle (07/27/04)
  • Re: Ions in the air Sam Wormley (07/27/04)
    • Re: Ions in the air jriegle (07/27/04)
  • Re: Ions in the air John (07/27/04)
• Describe This FFT alteredperception (07/27/04)
  • Re: Describe This FFT Greg Neill (07/27/04)
• Re: The 'Strong Force' is a fiction! (Part 1) Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• Re: Photons are gravitational charge units Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• Nobody noes it _yet_ Donald G. Shead (07/26/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ John Schoenfeld (07/30/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Herman Family (07/26/04)
    • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Gregory L. Hansen (07/27/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Arctangent the Infallible (07/27/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ floyd (07/27/04)
    • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ trik (07/27/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ rende (07/28/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ floyd (07/28/04)
    • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ half_pint (07/29/04)
  • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ David Murdock (07/27/04)
    • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Donald G. Shead (07/27/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ John Schoenfeld (07/30/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Donald G. Shead (07/30/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Donald G. Shead (07/30/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Herman Family (07/30/04)
      • Re: Nobody noes it _yet_ Richard Henry (07/30/04)
  • The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Mitchell (07/28/04)
    • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Mitchell (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Marcus Wellpoth (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Uncle Al (07/29/04)
    • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Herman Family (07/28/04)
• Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture Ron Hardin (07/26/04)
  • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/26/04)
    • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture Stella Liebeck (07/27/04)
  • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture tj Frazir (07/27/04)
    • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/27/04)
      • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture tj Frazir (07/28/04)
      • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/28/04)
  • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/28/04)
    • Re: Grass Cutting with Scythe & Moisture paghat (07/28/04)
• For a bit of humor... Harry Conover (07/26/04)
• Physics Olympiad results Maleki (07/26/04)
  • Re: Physics Olympiad results starwars (07/26/04)
    • Re: Physics Olympiad results Maleki (07/27/04)
  • Re: Physics Olympiad results sam1967_at_hetnet.nl (07/27/04)
• Attention: Mike Varney Jason Pawloski (07/26/04)
• What is an action on x_i? Marcus Wellpoth (07/26/04)
• Re: The 'Strong Force' a Pseudoscientific Fiction! Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
  • Re: The 'Strong Force' a Pseudoscientific Fiction! Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• The Remains of Humpty Dumpty Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
• Graphite magnets get ready for applications Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
  • Re: Graphite magnets get ready for applications Uncle Al (07/26/04)
• News of the Universe: The Lyman Alpha Forest by Ned Wright Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
• GOOGLE, OTHER ENGINES HIT BY WORM VARIANT Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) John Baez (07/26/04)
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) John Baez (07/29/04)
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 206) John Baez (07/26/04)
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 206) John Baez (07/26/04)
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 206) Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) John Baez (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Chan-Ho Suh (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Sam Wormley (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Chan-Ho Suh (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Sam Wormley (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Chan-Ho Suh (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Robert J. Kolker (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Uncle Al (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Robert J. Kolker (07/27/04)
      • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 207) Brian Quincy Hutchings (07/28/04)
• Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bilge (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Hobba (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Uncle Al (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Ian Macmillan (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Hobba (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Hobba (07/29/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames xxein (07/27/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames The Ghost In The Machine (07/27/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames The Ghost In The Machine (07/28/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Harry Conover (07/27/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Richard Henry (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Rowe (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Richard Henry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Richard Henry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames crynwulf (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
• Absolute Space, Motionless Bodies Donald Hamilton (07/26/04)
  • Re: Absolute Space, Motionless Bodies Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
  • Re: Absolute Space, Motionless Bodies Uncle Al (07/26/04)
• Re: Efficient use of Usenet Posts (not ac) Stormin Mormon (07/26/04)
• Dimentional ? Question Spud (07/26/04)
  • Re: Dimentional ? Question jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/26/04)
  • Re: Dimentional ? Question David W. Cantrell (07/26/04)
  • Re: Dimentional ? Question Uncle Al (07/26/04)
  • Re: Dimentional ? Question Spaceman (07/26/04)
    • Re: Dimentional ? Question Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
      • Re: Dimentional ? Question Spaceman (07/27/04)
      • Re: Dimentional ? Question Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
    • Re: Dimentional ? Question Igor (07/27/04)
      • Re: Dimentional ? Question Spaceman (07/27/04)
      • Re: Dimentional ? Question David Bandel (07/29/04)
      • Re: Dimentional ? Question Spaceman (07/29/04)
  • Re: Dimentional ? Question fishfry (07/27/04)
    • Re: Dimentional ? Question Spaceman (07/27/04)
• The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2) no way (07/26/04)
  • Re: The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2) jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/26/04)
  • Re: The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2) John Carruthers (07/26/04)
    • Re: The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2) no way (07/27/04)
      • Re: The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2) Mike Williams (07/27/04)
      • Re: The Second U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (UCAC2) Paul Cardinale (07/27/04)
• Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? Neercshq (07/26/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? Uncle Al (07/26/04)
  • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? François Guillet (07/26/04)
    • Re: Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented? Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
• Start writing your thesis now. Gregory L. Hansen (07/26/04)
  • Re: Start writing your thesis now. Creighton Hogg (07/26/04)
    • Re: Start writing your thesis now. Y. T. (07/29/04)
  • Re: Start writing your thesis now. Big Bird (07/26/04)
  • Re: Start writing your thesis now. puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (07/26/04)
  • Re: Start writing your thesis now. Gregory L. Hansen (07/27/04)
• Re: I will coach Ullrich to victory in 2005 Uncle Al (07/26/04)
  • Re: I will coach Ullrich to victory in 2005 Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
  • Re: I will coach Ullrich to victory in 2005 Phil Holman (07/26/04)
    • Re: I will coach Ullrich to victory in 2005 Uncle Al (07/26/04)
• The best computers require L2 orbits ? Jeff Relf (07/26/04)
  • Disentanglement HowTo For Dummies Jell-O Biafra (07/26/04)
    • The ultimate luxury ? Jeff Relf (07/26/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? tj Frazir (07/27/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Eric Gisse (07/26/04)
      • Shouldn't you be playing bingo right now ? Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
      • Re: Shouldn't you be playing bingo right now ? Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
      • How to sort by threads and/or the Subject line. Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
      • Re: How to sort by threads and/or the Subject line. Uncle Al (07/27/04)
      • Spaces are content, Mr. Gödel. Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
      • Re: How to sort by threads and/or the Subject line. Thomas Edison (07/27/04)
      • Re: How to sort by threads and/or the Subject line. Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
      • Re: How to sort by threads and/or the Subject line. Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
      • Re: Shouldn't you be playing bingo right now ? mitch perkins (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Thomas Edison (07/27/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Thomas Edison (07/27/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Thomas Edison (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? International All-Star Cast (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/28/04)
      • 40Tude Dialog. Jeff Relf (07/29/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jeff Relf (07/28/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/29/04)
      • _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference. Jeff Relf (07/29/04)
      • Re: _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference. Jesse F. Hughes (07/30/04)
      • You, Jesse, are a moron. Jeff Relf (07/31/04)
      • Re: _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference. Jesse F. Hughes (07/30/04)
      • Re: _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference. Johan Lindquist (07/30/04)
      • Re: _ SHOULD _ Have No Back Reference. Mike Hanson (07/30/04)
      • Your post had no other effect. Jeff Relf (07/31/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • You are in violation of RFC 1036. Jeff Relf (07/30/04)
      • Request For Comment International All-Star Cast (07/30/04)
      • I dreamed that I saw Dali. Jeff Relf (07/30/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/30/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: The ultimate luxury ? Jesse F. Hughes (07/30/04)
• GR is not " Wrong ". Jeff Relf (07/26/04)
  • Re: GR is not " Wrong ". Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • But Uncle Al is. Jeff Relf (07/26/04)
      • Re: But Uncle Al is. Uncle Al (07/27/04)
      • Getting a bit senile ? Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
      • Re: Getting a bit senile ? The Ghost In The Machine (07/27/04)
      • Why the sudden change of heart ? Jeff Relf (07/27/04)
      • Re: But Uncle Al is. tj Frazir (07/27/04)
      • Re: But Uncle Al is. jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com (07/27/04)
      • Re: But Uncle Al is. Mitchell (07/28/04)
      • Re: But Uncle Al is. Uncle Al (07/28/04)
• 1+x=00 Jihad Daoud (07/26/04)
• Professor to describe 'uncanny physics of comic book superheroes' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
  • Re: Professor to describe 'uncanny physics of comic book superheroes' Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: Professor to describe 'uncanny physics of comic book superheroes' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
• M&M's OBSESSION LEADS TO PHYSICS DISCOVERY Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
  • Re: M&M's OBSESSION LEADS TO PHYSICS DISCOVERY Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: M&M's OBSESSION LEADS TO PHYSICS DISCOVERY Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
  • Re: M&M's OBSESSION LEADS TO PHYSICS DISCOVERY Harry Conover (07/26/04)
    • Re: M&M's OBSESSION LEADS TO PHYSICS DISCOVERY Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
• Car Bombs vs Human Beings (physics, physiology thereof) Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
  • Re: Car Bombs vs Human Beings (physics, physiology thereof) Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: Car Bombs vs Human Beings (physics, physiology thereof) Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
• FTP Sites Wanted For Chemistry & Chemical Engineering E-book & Program Downloads JohnWW (07/26/04)
• Min's Essay #2 - Abortion Daniel Joseph Min (07/26/04)
• Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' MorituriMax (07/25/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Uncle Al (07/25/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Sam Wormley (07/25/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/26/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/26/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/27/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/27/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr_Postman (07/29/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Shrikantha S. Shastry (07/30/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr_Postman (07/30/04)
  • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' pdkgpznxenvlya_at_mailinator.com (07/30/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' vonroach (07/30/04)
    • Re: PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK' Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/30/04)
• Venting fridge heat Stormin Mormon (07/25/04)
  • Re: Venting fridge heat Harry Conover (07/26/04)
    • Re: Venting fridge heat HeatMan (07/27/04)
      • Re: Venting fridge heat CBHVAC (07/28/04)
      • Re: Venting fridge heat HeatMan (07/28/04)
    • Re: Venting fridge heat Stormin Mormon (07/29/04)
• FOURTH WAVE IN DISPLAYS Dr. Jai Maharaj (07/25/04)
  • Re: FOURTH WAVE IN DISPLAYS Uncle Al (07/25/04)
  • Re: FOURTH WAVE IN DISPLAYS Sam Wormley (07/25/04)
• Dr. Jai Maharaj - ARE YOU REALLY A DOCTOR? Reginald Perrin (07/25/04)
  • Re: Dr. Jai Maharaj - ARE YOU REALLY A DOCTOR? Dr_Postman (07/25/04)
  • Re: Dr. Jai Maharaj - ARE YOU REALLY A DOCTOR? Dr_Postman (07/27/04)
• Re: A call to Kamerynn to do some philosophy George Hammond (07/25/04)