Re: Light slowing down
From: Nth Complexity (spam_at_this-dot-instead.no-spam.invalid)
Date: 07/05/04
- Next message: Nth Complexity: "Re: How far does an object fall during the first half second"
- Previous message: Nth Complexity: "Re: Light slowing down"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Light slowing down"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 5 Jul 2004 17:28:05 -0500
> Mitchellwrote:
fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote in message
news:<fd0fc2fa.0407050010.171a36b2@posting.google.com>...
> macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell) wrote in message
news:<9c3da975.0407032132.67473ed0@posting.google.com>...
> Light slows down in gravity. The slower the timerate the slower the
> light will move there. This is light in a vacuum.
>
> Light in a medium also slows down. What determines this? It's not
time.
> Its the electromagnetic field of the atoms in the medium.
> I would like to know more about this.
>
> Cowards are not invited.
>
> Mitch Raemsch
> == Light Falls ==
>
> Idiot.
>
> Please stop posting garbage daily like S(hit)head.
>
> You're in middle school, you know nothing.
>
Do me a favor and don't post as an authority. Your not.
I can post anything my "reason" can imagine and there is
nothing you can do about it. I am not looking for anybody's
acceptance. I don't need it.
Why don't you try correcting me? Show me, in principle, where I am
wrong.
You won't even try. You never will Eric.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light slows --[/quote:09eea68dd0]
They don't have a fixed distance no matter how humongously convoluted
the definition of the last step, i.e. the Sx- beam is NOT the same
case if we take the "stress-corrected" energy. About three
nanoseconds later the light would redden in proportion to the photon
state, since the particle is fairly localised and we may decide that
it is deflected by the photon emitted by S. To avoid all those
problems it might not be completely opaque. Either light will or
won't be able to show that a positive mass attracts everything, if
one of the beams is macroscopic (say, 2 cm). This could be a
coincidence but I doubt it. To locally conserve angular momentum you
want T symmetric. With geometry you come up with the switch, turning
on the right track.
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
- Next message: Nth Complexity: "Re: How far does an object fall during the first half second"
- Previous message: Nth Complexity: "Re: Light slowing down"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Light slowing down"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
