Re: "Tired" light
From: greywolf42 (mingstb_at_marssim-ss.com)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: A little lesson for sqrt(144) year olds."
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: "Tired" light"
- In reply to: vonroach: "Re: "Tired" light"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: "Tired" light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:19:20 -0700
vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:k37pe0p07ifp862fgtd8a131t4sugh7vai@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:10:14 -0700, "greywolf42"
> <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote:
>
> >vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> >news:7m9me09d2p6cp82dckc1udirkbmcmpfl7d@4ax.com...
> >> On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:32:33 -0700, "greywolf42"
> >> <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Fractional energy loss, leading to exponential removal *is* the
> >> >commonly observed result of interactions with light. Why
> >> >would you consider this unusual or special?
> >>
> >> Can this be translated into English?
> >
> >It *is* English. Are you aware of fractional photon energy loss in thin
> >shields, and how it leads to an exponential curve?
>
> photoelectric effect.
Irrelevant.
> >I = I_0 exp(- mu x)
> >
> >or, for thick shields:
> >I = B(mu x) I_0 exp(- mu x)
>
> spare me the math. I prefer to see it (as with x-ray absorption)
Then you already knew and were just trolling.
--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for return e-mail}
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: A little lesson for sqrt(144) year olds."
- Previous message: greywolf42: "Re: "Tired" light"
- In reply to: vonroach: "Re: "Tired" light"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: "Tired" light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
