Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles
From: Craig Feinstein (cafeinst_at_msn.com)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: Michael Varney: "Re: Classical, theoretical physics"
- In reply to: Lee Rudolph: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Next in thread: Dr Chaos: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Reply: Dr Chaos: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Reply: Reinier Post: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Reply: Scott Aaronson: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Jul 2004 20:11:30 -0700
>>
> >> They don't. Soap films find a local minimum. They don't always find
> >> a global minimum. Other algorithms can also find local minima quickly.
> >> This does not help much with NP-complete problems.
> >>
> >> Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca
>
> Leaving the question of "choice" unaddressed, I will guess that the
> system simply evolves along the gradient of the appropriate potential
> function until it reaches a local (not necessarily global) minimum.
> Perhaps (we're talking nature here, right?) things are further
> sophisticated by (natural, not simulated) "annealing" (again, of
> an appropriate sort), say, thermal noise that is very likely to
> rather quickly kick the configuration of soap bubbles out of a
> sufficiently shallow local-not-global minimum and set it off
> down the flowlines of the gradient again. That still wouldn't
> necessarily guarantee reaching a global minimum in every case.
>
> Lee Rudolph
Have experiments been done to show that it is only a local minimum
that is reached by soap bubbles and not a global minimum or is this
just the party line? I'd like to believe that nature was designed to
be smarter than we give it credit.
I'd be willing to make a gentleman's bet that no one can site a paper
which describes an experiment that shows that the global minimum is
not always acheived with soap bubbles.
Craig
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: Michael Varney: "Re: Classical, theoretical physics"
- In reply to: Lee Rudolph: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Next in thread: Dr Chaos: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Reply: Dr Chaos: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Reply: Reinier Post: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Reply: Scott Aaronson: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|