Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
From: Joe Bergeron (jabergeron_at_earthlink.nettled)
Date: 07/12/04
- Next message: Sergey Karavashkin: "Maxwell's and Faraday's formulations of induction"
- Previous message: Bruce Pew: "Re: GOD=G_uv PEER/PUBLISHED"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Next in thread: MH: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Reply: MH: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 03:53:54 GMT
In article <SAmIc.6$25.1113@news.uchicago.edu>,
<mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> It takes a pretty dull or ognorant mind to think that all there is to
> the war on terror is dealing with Bin Laden and Al Queda. Al Queda is
> just one particular manifestation of Muslim Extremism and 9/11 was
> just one particular demonstration of Al Queda activities. Learn to
> evaluate and analyze, not just react. One doesn't fight malaria by
> swatting mosquitoes, even less so by directin all efforts on swatting
> the one particular posquito that happened to bite him.
There is absolutely no evidence linking Saddam Hussein and Al Qaida.
Even the Bush regime has admitted that. In fact it makes no sense to
believe that Saddam, who ran a secular government and was interested in
nothing but clinging to power, and was reviled by Osama Bin Laden for
his secularism, would do anything to encourage or empower a group which
would have been happy to see him overthrown (and which therefore must
be pretty happy about the results of our invasion).
That at any rate is my evaluation and analysis.
-- Joe Bergeron http://www.joebergeron.com
- Next message: Sergey Karavashkin: "Maxwell's and Faraday's formulations of induction"
- Previous message: Bruce Pew: "Re: GOD=G_uv PEER/PUBLISHED"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Next in thread: MH: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Reply: MH: "Re: Bush goes Nuclear!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
