Re: Does the Electron Neutrino Have Mass and Charge?

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 07/12/04 

Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:22:41 +0200

kenseto wrote:
> "Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
> news:ccmanp$b9n$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
>
>>kenseto wrote:
>>

[snip]

>>>>>>>That where I got this number from.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Even guesses need a *base*. You still have not told me on what basis
>>>>>>you guessed this number.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The Planck length.
>>>>
>>>>Finally, after asking about five times! Why not the first time already?
>>>
>>>
>>>Idiot.
>>
>>Yes, someone like you, who needs several reminders until he finally
>>answers a quite simple question, is indeed an idiot. Agreed.
>
>
> So you agreed that you are an idiot??

You have reading comprehension problems again, I see.

>>>>>The paper says that there are two
>>>>>fundamental entities in the universe: The E-Stirng and the S-Particle.
>>>>
>>>>The paper says that the S-particles are fundamental. It does say
>>>>nowhere that the E-Strings are fundamental. If you think otherwise,
>>>>quote the relevant sentence(s), please.
>>>
>>>
>>>The postulates said that the E-String and the S-Particle are the only
>>>two things exist in the universe.
>>
>>Your paper does not say that these are the only things which exist
>>in the universe. If you think otherwise, quote the relevant sentence(s),
>>please.
>
>
> <idiot>

I see that you are unable to quote the relevant statement.

I take that as an admission that you your paper does not say this.

> the MM postulates say that the S-Particle and the E-String are the
> only two things exists in the universe.

Again: Your paper does not say that these are the only things which
exist in the universe. If you think otherwise, quote the relevant
sentence(s), please.

> ....if all things (matters) in the universe are
> made from S-Patticles orbiting E-Strings and a photon is a wave packet
> in neighboring E-Strings what does that suggest to you??

Where does your paper say that "all things (matters) in the universe
are made from S-Particles orbiting E-Strings"? Quote, please.

>>>What do you think that mean?
>>
>>Even if it said that (which it doesn't), this would not imply that
>>the E-Strings are "fundamental".
>
>
> You are stupid.

Thanks for admitting that you have no argument left.

[snip]

>>>>>><www.m-w.org> for "emanate":
>>>>>>"to come from a source"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Insisting that a word does not mean what a dictionary says it means
>>>>>>makes you look rather silly, if you didn't notice.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hey idiot. I already explained to you how I use the word emanate in the
>>>>>paper. So live with it.
>>>>
>>>>So you insist on using the word with another meaning than its defined
>>>>meaning in a dictionary. I.e. you insist on looking silly. Fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>The word emanate was suggested by the editor of the Galilean
>>>Electrodynamics.
>>
>>Then he apparently also does not know its standard dictionary meaning.
>
>
> ROTFLOL....this is the same as you claimed that Weinberg doesn't know
> what his talking about.

I did never claim that. I did only say that what he wrote there
was not a definition, but only a visualization for laymen.

Have you really severe reading comprehension problems, or do you
willfully misrepresent what I wrote? I strongly suspect the second.
I.e., you are trolling.

> What a ding dong you turned out to be.

Thanks for admitting that you have no argument left.

>>>Everbody understands it except you.
>>
>>So you plus the editor of the journal together is "everybody"?

Apparently yes.

>>>Does that mean you are stupid?
>>
>>No, that does mean that both you and the editor of that journal
>>are silly, because you insist on using a word contrary to its
>>dictionary meaning.
>
>
> Idiot.

Thanks for admitting that you have no argument left.

Bye,
Bjoern

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem Cross-Validates PI Topological Big Bang
    ... > the later acceleration of the universe about 5 billion years ago, ... At least get the empirical timing correct, idiot, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: alternate cpm discussion group created
    ... Lee Hart wrote: ... snip ... ... > "When I want to make a man look like an idiot, I quote him." ...
    (comp.os.cpm)
  • Re: Anyway
    ... That is indeed a weird thought, as the big crunch theory is nothing to ... do with the shape of the universe and everything to do with how it ... [snip more proof you are an idiot.] ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT - Obamas new "pastor"
    ... That differs in huge ways from the quote you presented. ... One idiot copying another. ... "America is a fallen nation. ... "For us, the modern state is the great power, the great seducer, the great ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
  • Re: OT - Obamas new "pastor"
    ... That differs in huge ways from the quote you presented. ... Conscience got HIS version from an idiot who didn't bother to do its research. ... it has no direct quote from Rev. Jim Wallis. ... If you want to bother finding the actual passage and sharing it, ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
Quantcast