Re: The size of the shortest wave depends and is determined by the speed of light
From: luke (funk420_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/13/04
- Next message: Mohammed Farooq: "Re: UNUSED URANIUM, PLUTONIUM, etc."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- In reply to: Laurent: "Re: The size of the shortest wave depends and is determined by the speed of light"
- Next in thread: Laurent: "Re: The size of the shortest wave depends and is determined by the speed of light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Jul 2004 11:28:11 -0700
"Laurent" <cyberdyno5@netzero.net> wrote in message news:<Apudnb-EF7ju0m7dRVn-hg@comcast.com>...
> "Mitchell Jones" <mjones@jump.net> wrote in message
> news:mjones-2A3F4E.19022512072004@chiapp18.algx.net...
> > In article <LbedndzK4PVvr23dRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
> > "Laurent" <cyberdyno5@netzero.net> wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > matter like a fluid into a sink. Can such a "flowing" space also
> > > explain the other effects of gravity--such as the red shift of
> > > atomic spectra and the curvature of light? If so, can it be mere
> > > coincidence? " --- Henry H. Lindner
> >
> > ***{OK, Lauren, you posted the above quote and Lindner isn't here,
> so
> > these questions are for you:
> >
> > (1) If we postulate that "space" flows into masses to explain
> gravity,
> > then what do we postulate to explain *why* the "space" flows? Do
> we
> > postulate gravity, perhaps? :-)
>
>
> Electromotive force?
Inconsistent with your previous posts. E&M forces are "after" those
of the space-time fluid.. i.e. we try to use space-time to describe
electromotive force, not the other way around.
>
>
> >
> > (2) Where does "space"go after flowing into a mass? Does it flow
> right
> > back out again? If water flows out of a bathtub, it does so
> because the
> > drain is open. If the drain is plugged, or if there is no drain,
> then it
> > doesn't flow out. Do you claim that there are drains in masses
> through
> > which inflows of "space" can drain out?
>
>
> Good one.
>
> Each particle has a black hole, information is sucked into black
> holes, then re-appears as dark matter or quantum matter (space).
> [Klein, Hawking]
>
You are really grasping at straws here. Bringing an even more
abstract quantity (information) into play is a diversion technique.
Introducing other concepts that are beyond the current understanding
(black hole centers, dark matter) is not an answer.
Aethrons (space atoms) do not flow into masses and dissappear down a
wormhole. Rather, some of their properties (related to metric tensor)
are changed by a mass, and these changes diffuse away from the mass.
>
> >
> > (3) If the "space" doesn't drain out, then it must remain in the
> mass
> > into which it flowed, right? Therefore, as more and more "space"
> flows
> > into a mass, the pressure difference causing the flow ought to
> become
> > less and less, right? And eventually, the pressure should
> equalize,
> > right? In other words, as time passes the gravity of a massive
> body
> > ought to become less and less, until it eventually falls to zero,
> right?
> >
> > If satisfactory answers to the above questions cannot be found,
> then the
> > "space flow" theory of gravity is in ruins, is it not?
> >
> > --Mitchell Jones}***
> >
Good points Mitchell!
> > [snip]
>
> "Material particles are created where the photonic field
> constituting empty space collapses into atomic vorteces.
> [snip handwaving]
Lots of good ideas Laurent, thanks.. good luck putting them together
in a more coherent form!
- Next message: Mohammed Farooq: "Re: UNUSED URANIUM, PLUTONIUM, etc."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- In reply to: Laurent: "Re: The size of the shortest wave depends and is determined by the speed of light"
- Next in thread: Laurent: "Re: The size of the shortest wave depends and is determined by the speed of light"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|