Re: The Cost of Relativity
From: David Evens (devens_at_technologist.com)
Date: 07/18/04
- Next message: Y.Porat: "Re: How can photons be massless"
- Previous message: Zerkon: "Re: GR 17 Dublin"
- In reply to: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Reply: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 00:30:12 -0400
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 23:59:34 +0800, "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
>in message news:He7Kc.187590$Fl6.9226309@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>> "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:2lpsl1FffdroU2@uni-berlin.de...
>> > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com>
>wrote
>> > in message news:bkAJc.186224$hX5.9017489@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>> > >
>> > > "Leonard Pardin" <leoppard@MailAndNews.com> wrote in message
>> > news:d746a243.0407150418.497df3d8@posting.google.com...
>> >
>> > > > We see, then, that although any clock adjustment in the GPS
>system
>> > > > is unrelated to Relativity, it can be thought of as related to
>> > > > Relativity because it is "equivalent." The result: Relativists
>claim
>> > > > that GPS could not work without Relativity.
>> > >
>> > > There is a difference between the clock rates. The difference
>> > > is exactly as predicted by the theory.
>> > > You don't like it of course. But then again, no idiot likes what
>> > > he doesn't understand, does he?
>> >
>> > As can be seen from the following excerpt from a paper given at the
>>
>> Do you really think that I would even *look* at at what
>> an idiot who comes up with stupidities like these has to say:
>> http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PotterTable.html
>> http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FullHoles.html
>
>As my pappy used to say:
>"You get better information from the horse's mouth,
>than from a horse's ass."
>
>If anyone wants to know about me,
>I suggest that they visit my web site,
>as it has all kinds of information about
>me, my family, and my ideas.
>
>On the other hand,
>if you would like to see the world
>through a "horse's ass",
>I suggest that you visit Dork moortel's web site.
Why are you calling yourself 'Dork moortel' now? After all, you ARE
claiming to explain what the number 'e' is without calculus.
- Next message: Y.Porat: "Re: How can photons be massless"
- Previous message: Zerkon: "Re: GR 17 Dublin"
- In reply to: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Reply: Tom Potter: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|