Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste
From: Ian Stirling (root_at_mauve.demon.co.uk)
Date: 07/18/04
- Next message: Owain: "Re: real reason not to handle quartz bulb?"
- Previous message: Michael Varney: "Re: What form of matter will last the longest?"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste"
- Next in thread: Michael Moroney: "Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste"
- Reply: Michael Moroney: "Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Jul 2004 13:56:33 GMT
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Baby Elian wrote:
>>
>> Do you think is reliable the destruction of all weapons-usable materials and
>> 95% destruction of all transuranic waste in this work?
>> http://www.iaea.org/inis/aws/htgr/fulltext/htr2002_207.pdf
>
> Hey stooopid - why not leave it in the reactor and let it heal
> itself?
Because some of the stuff is effective fission poisons.
- Next message: Owain: "Re: real reason not to handle quartz bulb?"
- Previous message: Michael Varney: "Re: What form of matter will last the longest?"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste"
- Next in thread: Michael Moroney: "Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste"
- Reply: Michael Moroney: "Re: Deep burn transmutation of nuclear waste"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|