Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
From: Eric Gisse (fsegg_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Angelo: "Re: What form of matter will last the longest? (OT)"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Inflation and the current accelerating expansion of the universe"
- In reply to: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 00:17:57 -0800
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:59:25 GMT, "Spaceman"
<Spaceman@realspaceman.com> wrote:
>
>"Timo Nieminen" <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote in message
>news:Pine.LNX.4.50.0407201241480.9287-100000@localhost...
>} The postulates are chosen so that predicted measurements agree with
>} experimental measurements.
>
>postulates chosen huh?
><LOL>
>So.
>they represent no physical reality at all?
>
>} > What physical "things" or measurements of things, are these numbers representing?
>}
>} Time and position vectors of events 1 and 2.
>
>Wrong,
>Time is not a physical thing and niether are position vectors.
>
You don't even understand basic multiplication, what makes you think
you understand vectors?
- Next message: Angelo: "Re: What form of matter will last the longest? (OT)"
- Previous message: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Inflation and the current accelerating expansion of the universe"
- In reply to: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|