Re: GOD=G_uv UNWIN EXPLAINS BIRTH

From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/20/04 

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:34:02 GMT



--
============================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
============================================
"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> wrote in message
news:eXbLc.8393$Zr.2884@okepread01...
> George Hammond wrote:
> >>>>>[Stephen Unwin]
> >>>>>Oh, I thought Guv was in literal spacetime. I guess then that in the
> >>>>>perceptual space, a new born baby would be the analogy of a
singularity
> >>>>>(big bang rather than a black hole). Very interesting.
> >>>>>Steve
> >>   Read what I wrote. What factors do you think influence
> >>brain growth?
> >
> >
> > [Hammond]
> > The STANDARD OF LIVING is far and away the dominant, leading,
> > number one cause of the GROWTH DEFICIT.  Why the christ don't
> > you bother to actually read the theory before hollering a lot
> > of b.s. about it on Usenet?
>
>    Sigh. I have. You're still ignoring part of reality.
[Hammond]
I'm ignoring nothing.
<snip... several miles of time wasting banter>
> > [Hammond]
> > the qualifications for "mentioning possibilities" and
> > being taken seriously are something like:
> >
> > 1.  Being a PhD in quantum gravity like Steve Unwin
> > 2.  Being an internationally prominent author
> >     like Steve Unwin
> >
> > nobodies like you are required to give laborious
> > scientific rationals and empirical proof of their
> > "suggested possibilities".
>................ I am not writing this for your
> approval, but to see if your theory is capable of better
> than what so-called "psychology" has managed. Yet you seem
> intent on ignoring a rather large part of what affects brain
> and mind growth, namely the effect of others on an
> individual's progress.
[Hammond]
Look... we're not interested in "microanalysis" in the discovery
of a MAJOR theory.  the term "Standard of Living" encompasses
EVERYTHING that bears on the Secular Trend in braingrowth...
including "the effects of others" for chrissakes.
> You won't like this part either; some people apparently
> deliberately make themselves stupider,.................
> Yes, I know that's an aberration, but a very common one
> that appears under different guises.
[Hammond]
Are you trying to be a comedian or something?  What the fcuk
do you think "sin"  is?  Every person in the world is
walking around trying to appear "stupid"... and the one who
can appear the stupidist is judged to be the smartest.
What do you think "psychosis" and "psychological warfare" and
"reverse psychology" is for chrissakes?
   Hey... buy a helmut.
> > [Hammond]
> > Who cares.  I'm here to prove God exists.
>
>    So you assume your theory can have no functional
> applications? Or just not yet?
[Hammond]
The only functional application I'm interested in is giving
a scientific weapon to the oppressed of the world that will
enable them to en masse round up the bad guys and hang them
from the nearest tree.  And THAT is the main application of
a scientific proof of God.  And that by the way, is also
the object of DEMOCRACY, so the s.p.o.g. is the major weapon
of Democracy and the American way.
> >> When the brain dies, it
> >>effectively permanently resorbs all its accumulated knowledge.
>
> > [Hammond]
> > Not so fast.... WE DON'T KNOW what happens when the
> > brain dies... especially what effect the fact that
> > it is not fully grown has on death.  The possibilities are
> > so vast one can't even hazard a credible GUESS as to
> > the liklihood of what happens subjectively.  For instance,
> > there is SOME possibility there is "life after death"
> > (according to historical sources)... and of all things
> > this discovery which shows that "Psychology is relativistic"
> > raises the possibility that the last few moments
> > (nano seconds) of life could be "time dilated" into
> > years so that "life after death" might actually be
> > "life before death" which only APPEARS to extend beyond death.
> > WE HAVE NO IDEA!!
>
>     No, we shouldn't make guesses about the subjective
> experience of death just yet (even the time-dilation guess
> you made, though it does seem justifiable), but I meant that
> from an objective empirical standpoint when a person dies,
> that person takes all their knowledge with them _from our
> perspective_; they've effectively permanently collapsed
> beyond our perceptual horizon. That's why I mentioned vacuum
> diagrams.
>
>    I'll also ask you whether you've taken into account the
> gradient of a given mind; i.e. at birth, one learns very
> fast, and later in life one tends to slow down. So, at
> death, what?
>
> >   I'd laugh my ass off if it turns out there actually IS
> > life after death!
>
>    Only one (subjective) way to find out (disregarding NDE
> BS), and I'm in no hurry.
>
>    Mark L. Fergerson
[Hammond]
I'm in a big hurry.  The older I get the more outraged
I get at the human condition... starving children,
brutalized women, child labor, for chrissakes... here I
sit with the first major advance on the problem in 2,000
years and NOBODY... FCUKIN NOBODY will move a fcukin
finger to help me.  Whaddaru people, brain dead?
============================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
============================================

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GOD=G_uv UNWIN EXPLAINS BIRTH
    ... SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE ... > George Hammond wrote: ... And THAT is the main application of a scientific proof of God. ... especially what effect the fact that>> it is not fully grown has on death. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about God=G_uv
    ... Hammond has now DISCOVERED THE CAUSAL MECHANISM OF ID. ... and the SPoG will ... SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE ... >> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... >> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE ... To say it was a typo proves you a liar. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PHYSICS, TERRORISM & GOD=G_uv
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... >> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE ... To say it was a typo proves you a liar. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >> Moderation is a must, not only to get rid of you graffitti artists, ... to discuss a real scientific proof of God in an unmoderated newsgroup". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)