Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]
From: Ralph Hertle (ralph.hertle_at_verizon.net)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Recantation on inettia"
- Previous message: Andrew Resnick: "Re: Nitrogen Power: New crystal packs a lot of punch"
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult?"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:33:12 GMT
Bill:
[snip]
Bill Hobba wrote:
> Ralph Hertle wrote:
>
>>The widest concepts of existence are dealt with by philosophy,
>>especially within the classifications of metaphysics and epistemology.
>
>
> Yes. To do physics you only need a very simple philosophy saying things
> like time is what clocks read or space not endowed with a coordinate system
> is not much use etc. Such is not satisfying to a philosopher but all you
> need to do physics.
>
[snip]
I think that you are minimizing the role of philosophy in science. There
is far more to it than that.
For example is is in philosophy that the following topics and
subsciences are discussed"
Philosophy
Methods of developing knowledge
Metaphysics
Basic axioms
Existence
Being
Continuity
Nature of man
Identifications of nature of existents
Substance
Properties
Change
Potentials for change
Location, methods of identification
size, concepts of amount
Types of motion
Functioning
Results of causes
Epistemology
Basic axioms
Consciousness
Nature of mind
Memory
Processing
Identification
Theory of Knowledge
Definitions
Genus and differentia
Proofs of definitions
Generalizations
Logic
Induction
Concept formation
Inferences
Generalization
Innovation
Invention
Discovery
Identification
Methods of induction
Validation of induction
Verification of deductive premises
Deduction
Syllogistic logic
Proof
Demonstration
Experimentation
Methods
Rules
Validation of inductive concepts
Psychology
Sense Perception
biological structures
Processing
Awareness
Concept formation
Biological structures
Processing
Purpose formulation
Logic
Pathology
Science [ or Philosophy of Science ]
Cause and effect
Methods
Scientific method(s)
Demonstration
Experimentation
Proof
Identification
Formulation of principles
Measurement science
Mathematics
.........
There is more.
Not to minimize the role of philosophy in science.
I'll stay with the items that I've mention for my science, and you can
keep your timer clocks and space-coordinate system.
Ralph hertle
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Recantation on inettia"
- Previous message: Andrew Resnick: "Re: Nitrogen Power: New crystal packs a lot of punch"
- In reply to: Bill Hobba: "Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult?"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|