Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman
From: Spaceman (Spaceman_at_realspaceman.com)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Andrew B. Park: "Re: How can photons be massless"
- In reply to: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman"
- Next in thread: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman"
- Reply: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:17:13 GMT
"Myxococcus xanthus" <mold-guardian@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ce5e7813.0407211928.6cefb5f7@posting.google.com...
} "Spaceman" <Spaceman@realspaceman.com> wrote in message news:<fhBLc.140442$JR4.67208@attbi_s54>...
} > "Myxococcus xanthus" <mold-guardian@comcast.net> wrote in message
} > news:ce5e7813.0407202240.511967f@posting.google.com...
} > } It is a representation of what could not possibly work.
} >
} > Thanks. (I feel like a Wright brother now)
} > Nevermind with anymore you state,
} > Know why?
} > I already made a small plastic version of it, that does work.
}
} As I recall from the zillions of Lego toys that my kids played with
} when they were young, (expecially the ones that I stepped on...OUCH!)
} the propeller on a Lego plane has C(n) symmetry. The blades are
} wedge-shaped, sort of blunt in their leading edges, and have a bit of
} a "scoop" to them. So a Lego propeller may indeed spin
} unidirectionally with transverse flow.
I never said I used a lego prop.
} The turbine you have DRAWN, however, has precise D(n) symmetry. My
} arguments have always been directed towards your design as presented
} on your website.
Yes, but have you actually tried anything like it at all?
Or are you just going to keep saying no without ever trying it ever?
} The turbine design that you have presented is truly horrible, as
} regards your stated purpose.
I never said it was the best, and I know it is not truly horrible,
that (horrible) only comes from your "non testing" in reality it seams.
} Your engine will be horribly inefficient unless you introduce valves.
The valves "eletronic" (and sensors to operate them)
are there, maybe you open your eyes and brain a bit more,
and rethink it again.
So far it looks like you galnced for a second,
and said "there is no way it will fly Mr Wright."
:)
- Next message: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: Andrew B. Park: "Re: How can photons be massless"
- In reply to: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman"
- Next in thread: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman"
- Reply: Myxococcus xanthus: "Re: Proposal: How to deal with Spaceman"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|