Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?
From: JonTi (jonti_at_london.com)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Previous message: Mike Helland: "Re: Photon Mass, Measuring Distance, and Mercury's orbit"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Next in thread: Patrick Reany: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:22:10 +0100
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:10:34 +0000, Bilge wrote:
> Why are rules we discover not the ones by which nature abides?
Well, they may be. It's just that we cannot know that. Our "rules",
though accurate enough for the data we *now* possess, may yet be found
wanting in the future.
You're not listening, are you?
- Next message: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Previous message: Mike Helland: "Re: Photon Mass, Measuring Distance, and Mercury's orbit"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Next in thread: Patrick Reany: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]