Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD
From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (ahmed.ouahi_at_welho.com)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Previous message: JonTi: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- In reply to: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Next in thread: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Reply: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:38:45 +0300
................. ...All that we are is the result of what we have
thought: It is founded on our thoughts and is made up of our
thoughts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...................... ...
-- Dhammapada
-- Ahmed Ouahi, Architect Best Regards! "Goran Dhemmeog" <hcraeser731@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:b9eccd47.0407221141.34ea6e36@posting.google.com... > Ok, George. If you know something about Buddhism, please can you show > me the passage in some Buddhist text? You say you are a scientist. > Then please do some research. Go read Dhammapada, or The Heart of > Perfect Wisdom. Show me where there is a reference to God. Actually I > have full confidence that you can find something from there to that > effect, but remember it is not "an invisible man, who controls all > things and should be worshipped by all devout buddhists". Be careful! > And sure you have time. Skip a few usenet posts. I am sure no-one will > mind. You can send that next "SPOG rules" next month. If you have read > those once, read them again. Please, do me a tiny favor. > > I don't say that making a demographic survey on your readers is a > proof, but it does show wether you reach the people you are preaching > for. If you go to China and speak gibberish that you think is chinese, > but no-one seems to understand, it is safe to say that what you are > saying is not chinese. It does not prove however that what you say is > not some other valid language. Go learn chinese. Go read the Dhammada! > > Well technically MSc in something is not yet scientific credentials. > Not even Phd is. Phd would tell that the person holding that degree is > capable of scientific work but does not yet signify that the person > has done so. Perhaps having some ackowledged work, and publications > done is a whiff in that way. But George, no-one can really say himself > having credentials. That honor is attributed by others. Scientific > credentials are not something that wins a debate. It is something the > editor writes in the back of the book you write. I promise, I say that > you have credentials if you read the Heart of Perfect Wisdom.
- Next message: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Previous message: JonTi: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- In reply to: Goran Dhemmeog: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Next in thread: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Reply: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect: "Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
