Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: spacetime and the jokes it has created"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: What is a "four vector"?"
- In reply to: Russell E. Rierson: "Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Next in thread: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Reply: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Reply: Edward Green: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:35:14 -0500
"Russell E. Rierson" wrote:
[snip]
> The description of any entity inside the real universe can only be
> with reference to other things in the universe. Space is then
> relational, and the universe, self referential. For example, if an
> object/event has a momentum, that momentum can only be explained with
> respect to another object/event within the universe. Space then
> becomes an aspect of the relationships between things in reality.
Acceleration is an absolute measurement - or are you Machian?
Mach's view of the universe is philosophy not science.
> If the universe is a causally closed system, the "information" or
> entangled quantum states cannot leak out of the closed system. So the
> "event" density of entangled quantum states, continually increases, as
> the entropy must always increase. While to us, it is interpreted as
> entropy or lost information, it is actually recombined information, to
> the universe.
Unsubstantiated.
> The present moment is created and recreated constantly - analogous to
> continually opposing/juxtaposing reflective mirror images…
Now you are bullshitting.
> Unstable or chaotic states at a
> given level are always "compactified" (stabilized and bounded by
> eigenstates) into 6 higher dimensions condensing to the next level of
> "event density".
Now you are badly bullshitting.
> Since relativity explains that there is no preferred frame of
> reference, the ether becomes superfluous;
No, stooopid. GR *postulates* Lorentz Invariance. Lorentz
Invariance and the aether are contradictory, e.g.,
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
> consequently, the metric of
> space-time must be defined by related events, such, that there is no
> space-time if there are no events. Time is thus a sequence of events,
> with each "event", having its own measure of location, and its own
> measure of time, with reference to other events. Space becomes an
> event density-probability distribution.
Go away.
> The organic analogues of quantum attractors are translated via
> quantized fractal modes onto the classical domain via
> compactification,
Buncha crap.
[snip]
> Resonating standing waves/waveforms. The past collapses/condenses/
> compactifies in 6 dimensions to the present moment, while the future
> is an expanding uncertainty, in four space-time dimensions.
Bull***. Not even facile bull***, just common everyday ***
vs. Shinola bull***.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: spacetime and the jokes it has created"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: What is a "four vector"?"
- In reply to: Russell E. Rierson: "Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Next in thread: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Reply: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Reply: Edward Green: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]