Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH

From: David Evens (devens_at_technologist.com)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:54:14 -0400

On 23 Jul 2004 19:29:24 GMT, danfoxart@NOSPAMyahoo.com(Dan Fox) wrote:
>As a graduate physicist myself (M.S., WVU, 1971), I've looked over the
>Hammond stuff and have a question: why do real physicists here bother with
>this guy at all? He is clearly insane; his ideas aren't even bad science -
>they are gibberish.

Well, he's sane enough that they let him roam the streets (well, it IS
Massachusetts, where the people have elected a certain drunken,
lecherous buffoon to the US Senate for the same period of time George
claims to have been defrauding the State, so you have to take the fact
he's loose advisedly). He's also very, very funny to humiliate,
although it tends to wear thin.

In any event, nobody posts here for work purposes, it's strictly
recreational. Showing people a newly observered knot that George has
tied himself into without noticing is amusing. I find ridiculing
sociopaths like Potty the Vandal (a name derived from his habit of
spewing sewage and his bragging about having driven a useful company
into bankrupcy with vandalism are the root of the nickname) to be
quite enjoyable, especiually since he seems to be unable to understand
WHY he is being so easily ridiculed.

>Here's one for you: when I was a freshman I found a little book in the
>library by one Arthur Otis, PhD. It was a nonsensical refutation of general
>relativity (Otis was dead serious). I actually found it on the web - if
>you're interested in a taste go to
>http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=61647071

Reminds me of a video I saw once, in which a former geologist whose
brain appeared to have gone soft went on about how this 300 foot high
sheer limestone cliff was cut through lime mud by a river...

>By the way, I looked at George Hammond's picture at his site. He looks so
>... normal. Of course, so did Jeffrey Daumer.

The picture Potty put on his site looks normal, too, except that
there's no reason to ssuppose either picture is of the person it is
claimed to be.

Quantcast