Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits

From: Paul Stowe (ps_at_acompletelyjunkaddress.net)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:09:36 GMT

On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:51:50 GMT, "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote:

>
>"Paul Stowe" <ps@acompletelyjunkaddress.net> wrote in message
>news:gb16g01749t7op3jublhv6hmdh78ci93jb@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:56:59 GMT, "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au>
>wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Ole D. Rughede" <ole.rughede@privat.dk> wrote in message
>> >news:4102b3de$0$295$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
>>
>> [Snip...]
>>
>> >> What would count as detection of the Aether Bill?
>> >
>> > Read previous responses to Stowe on this issue - do a google search.
>>
>> Hmmm like,
>>
>> "Until experiments have been conducted that definitively show
>> an aether then logic allows me, an anyone else with a brain,
>> to say we have no definite evidence of the existence of an
>> aether. And do not retort with what would count as evidence
>> - obviously the same type as evidence we have for the
>> existence of atoms ie an experiment whose only reasonable
>> interpretation is an aether just like the only reasonable
>> interpretation of Brownian motions was the existence of
>> atoms. ... "
>>
>> See previous post...
>
> Yes Paul - just like that. See how easy it is. BTW if you continue
> searching you will see it is not the only time I have given the same
> explanation.

 And I don't care how many times you peddle the SOS| Great, give us
 a causal explanation for non-contact interactions... I need only
 one other rather than a carrier media. Try somethin' simple, explain
 Gauss's Law,

                                 S
                          f = ------
                               4piR^2

 By some other physical process than a physical fluence moving radially
 outward.

> And also note that I did not say than evidence of an aether would be
> the existence of an atomic structure that could only be attributed
> to an aether

 It is, but then again you seem to have zero concept or capability
 of same of thinking physically (pictorial process wise).

> - notice the words - the same type - meaning any evidence that
> can only be attributed to the existence of an aether.

 See above, give us another causal mean of the communication of
 non-contact interaction other than it fields and those just are,
 Duh, drool...

 Paul Stowe

Relevant Pages

  • Re: THE GENESES OF THE FALSE THEORIES IN PHYSICS
    ... Even before physics turned into metaphysics no theory was rejected - ... was rejected and the wave in aether theory accepted. ... All the evidence pointed to the fact that light is primarily ... Every attempt to demonstrate the existence of an aether has failed. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: my gravity theory - Web Link
    ... Our version of ether claims it to be the only substance ... in existence, and also claims that it is not composed of smaller particles'. ... The evidence I have seen says otherwise. ... aether wind would break the POR) and coulombs law leads to Maxwell's ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... >> Yada, Yada, Yada. ... >> scientists do not accept its existence. ... > Take away Einstein's aether and you have no EM fields. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... >> Yada, Yada, Yada. ... >> scientists do not accept its existence. ... > Take away Einstein's aether and you have no EM fields. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... >> an aether then logic allows me, an anyone else with a brain, ... And do not retort with what would count as evidence ... >> existence of atoms ie an experiment whose only reasonable ... of same of thinking physically (pictorial process wise). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)