Re: Quantum Phase Relativity
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 07/25/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Previous message: Donald G. Shead: "Galileo & Newton"
- In reply to: analog57: "Quantum Phase Relativity"
- Next in thread: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Relativity"
- Reply: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:16:26 -0500
analog57 wrote:
>
> Quantum Phase Relativity :D :D :D
>
> The description of any entity inside the real universe can only be
> with reference to other things in the universe.
Mach did it first. It is philosophy not science. Acceleration
is an absolute measurment. Why did you repost this ***?
[snip 290 lines of maunder]
> The organic analogues of quantum attractors are translated via
> quantized fractal modes onto the classical domain via
> compactification, while events on the classicaly canonical domain, of
> three spatial dimensions plus time, influence the
> collapse/condensation of these attractors on the quantum-level via
> feedback exitation modes.
Idiot. Delusions of competence.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Previous message: Donald G. Shead: "Galileo & Newton"
- In reply to: analog57: "Quantum Phase Relativity"
- Next in thread: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Relativity"
- Reply: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]