Re: Bush goes Nuclear!

From: Double-A (double-a_at_hush.com)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: 25 Jul 2004 06:55:26 -0700

"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<2mh10lFmqubbU9@uni-berlin.de>...
> "Double-A" <double-a@hush.com> wrote in message
> news:79094630.0407231659.194453d7@posting.google.com...
> > "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:<2mcqkuFlp3k4U12@uni-berlin.de>...
> > > "Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > news:7bTW6spoF+$AFwEQ@baesystems.com...
> > > > In message <2ma0ajFkgn2dU1@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> > > > >-"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > >"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > > > >news:2m7icvFd7ushU12@uni-berlin.de...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >> news:PBW7sN1$5T$AFwTu@baesystems.com...
> > > > >> > In message <2m4rgqFi6ib4U2@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > >> > <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >> > >news:CiJIU+AAoN$AFwQo@baesystems.com...
> > > > >> > >> In message <2m29h3Fhqqi4U8@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > >> > >> <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> >"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >> > >> >news:X2eNhPEax4+AFwrn@baesystems.com...
> > > > >> > >> >> In message <2lt0pnFgf3viU2@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > >> > >> >> <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
>
> > > > >> > >> >> >What do you recommend?
> > > > >> > >> >> >
> > > > >> > >> >> You could start by correcting all the errors in your
> "tutorial".
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> >I'll be more than happy to correct any errors
> > > > >> > >> >that you can point out, and prove are errors.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> I already have. You acknowledged the error, then failed to
> make
> the
> > > > >> > >> correction.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >As I recall, "Richard Herring" found NO specific errors in the
> tutorial.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Then your recollection is incorrect.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It may well be that your "recollection is incorrect."
> > > >
> > > > [unacknowledged snip restored]
> > > > >>>Did you buy those scare quotes by the bushel?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If you think you are "correct"
> > > > >> post your old post, and let's see what it said.
> > > > >
> > > > >- http://tinyurl.com/3wqob
> > > > >-
> > > > >-Note the subject line. Read the rest of the thread.
> > > > >-
> > > > >Don't play games, equivocate, or run and hide,
> > > >
> > > > ROFL. PKB.
> > > >
> > > > >just repost your old post,
> > > > >and let's see what it said.
> > > >
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/3wqob is a link to my old post, in context, and
> your
> > > > lying response to it.
> > > >
> > > > Are you unable to follow the link to it?
> > > >
> > > > >Are you afraid to debate the content of your post?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think you understand. I'm simply not _interested_ in
> "debating"
> > > > anything with you, if that's what you call your puerile word games.
> > > > You're not just a troll but a boring troll.
> > > >
> > > > You asked for evidence; I have presented evidence. End of story.
> > >
> > > All I have seen is your assertion that you "presented evidence".
> > >
> > > If you cannot post your evidence,
> > > and be prepared to defend your assertion,
> > > I can only assume that you are a liar,
> > > and have no "evidence", or else,
> > > you are not too confident in the evidence
> > > you claim to have.
> >
> > I did read the evidence posted by Herring.
> >
> > It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was
> > better than yours.
>
> If
> "It was wondrous to see <me>
> admitting that his definition was better than <mine>"
>
> why don't you post the actual exchange,
> so that other folks can experience this "wondrous" thing?
>
> That way, rational, intelligent folks can determine
> for themselves what the facts are.

Because the rational, intelligent folks know how to go look at the
reference directly in its original context, just as I did.

Double-A

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
    ... >> I did read the evidence posted by Herring. ... >> It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was ... intelligent folks know how to go look at the ... reference directly in its original context, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
    ... >> I did read the evidence posted by Herring. ... >> It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was ... intelligent folks know how to go look at the ... reference directly in its original context, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
    ... >> I did read the evidence posted by Herring. ... >> It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was ... intelligent folks know how to go look at the ... reference directly in its original context, ...
    (sci.archaeology)