Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries
From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Getting back to basics"
- Previous message: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Relativity"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Next in thread: MorituriMax: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Reply: MorituriMax: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Jul 2004 19:29:33 -0700
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41040EF6.A20830E2@hate.spam.net>...
> Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > "MorituriMax" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message news:<yoCMc.25853$pR5.18918@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
> > > Mitchell wrote:
> > >
> > > > You can't have it both ways. Either you start without gravity but with
> > >
> > > How the hell do you know that? Perhaps you can have it both ways at the
> > > beginning when the conditions are different than they are now... since you have
> > > yet to post any math or data to back up anything you argue, you really can't
> > > honestly make that statement.
> >
> > It is obvious that if you start with flat space-time you start with boundaries.
> > You have nothing to argue against this MMax.
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> > -- Light Falls --
You are backward think Uncle AL.
-- Time Moves --
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Getting back to basics"
- Previous message: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: Quantum Phase Relativity"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Next in thread: MorituriMax: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Reply: MorituriMax: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Starting out without gravity creates Boundries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]