Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
From: Jim Greenfield (greenfield_7_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: ZZBunker: "Re: Hawking's talk in Dublin GR 17 On the spot report!"
- Previous message: Peter Kinane: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jul 2004 06:03:21 -0700
dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrncg8nm8.2b2.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>...
> Jim Greenfield:
>
> >Photon has on/off or push/pull signal due to its spin.
>
> Then why is the helicity a lorentz invariant? If you could
> catch up to or speed away from light, then you would see
> the polarization of circularly polarized light change directions.
>
> >This could be comparing a photon to a spinning bar magnet,
> >with the north/south poles creating the frequency, or like
> >a proton (+) and electron (-) couple.
>
> Only if you can say what it is, rather than what it is like,
> because the spin is nothing like that.
What part of the word "comparing" don't you undersatand?
>
> >Say the photon has a spin of 5 rev per sec and a linear travel of 4
>
> Spin has units of angular momentum not Hz.
>
> >per sec, it exhibits a frequency of 20 "vibrations" per sec, AT A
> >POINT.
>
> I'd like to see how you make _that_ work in the real world.
Easier than shrinking a stick, or picking up my twin brother's
inheritance by taking a trip (and outliving him)
>
> >If spin stays the same, and linear speed is increased to 5/sec, then
> >frequency is "observed" as 25 (Doppler blued) ie, the increased
> >frequency is due to the increased linear velocity.
>
> Have you ever considered the possibility that your ``explanations''
> need to fit more than a single picutre you have on one phenomena,
> or do you expect to introduce new magic numbers to offset the
> the problems you introduced by the previous magic numbers, just to
> avoid the simple answer?
Magic numbers??????? ..that would be what; 4,5 ?????
>
> >However, NO frequency change would be observed if the spin slowed to 4
> >
> >Thus colour is photons travelling at same velocity, but of differing
> >spin rates (when observed say, from sunlight), but may actually be the
> >result of photons of the same spin travelling at different linear
> >velocities.
>
> You'll have to come up with a new name for that unobservable
> magic number, since spin is already taken and used to describe
> an observable quantity that doesn't fit your magic number.
The only magical numbers that concern me, at present, are those "less
than zeros" which relate to a natural physical entity. As NO DHR has
yet to produce one, I can now forget them, as surely one would have
appeared by now (especially as I offered such a good reward)
>
> >So i say, in many cases, change of observed frequency is the result
> >of.....
>
> A magic, unobserved number which is needed to explain the
> also unobserved velocity,
You think implying that I suggested any such thing gives you kudos?
Basically, it is just a form of slander and deceit.
>
> >...... C'= C+V !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> just to avoid a perfectly sensible explanation that contains only
> experimental observations. Nice work. It's great to see folks that
> believe that anything they don't understand can readily be fixed by
> introducing an arbitrary number of new quantities that can't ever
> be measured. Here I was, consigned to the fact that experiments
> were important to physics.
Sorry; I thought that you understood Doppler.....my mistake!
Jim G
- Next message: ZZBunker: "Re: Hawking's talk in Dublin GR 17 On the spot report!"
- Previous message: Peter Kinane: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|