Re: fission question
puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com
Date: 07/26/04
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: Hawking's talk in Dublin GR 17 On the spot report!"
- Previous message: Jaxtraw: "Re: Min's Intro & Essay #1"
- In reply to: Steven Sharp: "Re: fission question"
- Next in thread: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: fission question"
- Reply: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: fission question"
- Reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: fission question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jul 2004 07:11:38 -0700
sharp@cadence.com (Steven Sharp) wrote in message news:<3a8e124e.0407231355.15f66c0c@posting.google.com>...
[snip]
> Are you sure that radiation is the dominant heat loss mechanism from
> the core in that timeframe? These cores were sitting inside
> hemispherical hollows in metal reflectors. The thermal contact may not
> have been great, but there would be some conduction into that larger
> metallic mass, delaying meltdown.
Horseback feeling from experience with commercial nuclear fuel:
A core such as this, in five seconds, would be fairly accurately
treated as adiabatic. That is, practically speaking no energy
would conduct out thermally in that time. I certainly have not
run any numbers on it. Certainly a power pulse in the 10's of
kilowatts range would be very little affected by conduction during
the first few seconds.
Probably thermal radiation during the first few seconds would be
nearly negligable as well. Just not time for the heat to move around
very much.
I'm thinking, though, that a significant fraction of the energy
would have gone away as neutrons that didn't interact with the
core. The fact that this thing is just barely over prompt would
tend to say that there are still a goodly fraction going away,
winding up in lab gear, lab personnel, etc. So, the lack of a
melt may not be all that surprising, as long as the event is
terminated in a few seconds. The lab equipment probably got warm
(thermally as well as by induced radiation) fairly quickly.
Socks
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: Hawking's talk in Dublin GR 17 On the spot report!"
- Previous message: Jaxtraw: "Re: Min's Intro & Essay #1"
- In reply to: Steven Sharp: "Re: fission question"
- Next in thread: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: fission question"
- Reply: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: fission question"
- Reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: fission question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|